![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Quote:
we have on many many times pointed out that the only place you'll see the official policy on anything is on the main site. this is a discussion board, nothing else. as for pailrail, i for one couldnt care less what the hurlers on the ditch think of us. we do things, they dont. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 37
|
![]() The Tribune - which is generally on the ball on railway matters - is reporting that the entire Limerick Junction - Rosslare section is being earmarked for closure along with the Nenagh branch.
![]() It seems some secret deal has been trashed out between CIE and the department - they'll close Waterford-Rosslare now and then kill off the other two lines at some point in the near future. The story isn't online yet but it's on page 2 of their printed edition. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() This is the price which will be paid for the Ennis-Athenry line.
As always crude political pressures come out on top. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() You would be amazed, I did the numbers
Waterford-Rosslare per year approx 2.4-2.6million WRC 2.5 million Hmmm
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by PLUMB LOCO : 14-03-2010 at 13:21. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() I note that if someone wanted to book Limerick-Ballybrophy-Dublin Heuston to bump up their numbers, the booking program doesn't offer those journeys. Interesting...
When Athenry was disconnected, the line was left open as far as Ennis which despite a desperately slow line developed into a half-decent commuter service. IE should be instructed that on no account will they be allowed close the entire Nenagh Branch. What they should be permitted to do is disconnect Nenagh-Ballybrophy on the understanding that the timetable be recast to reflect the current rail relay and replacement of any remaining jointed rail, with the objective of getting the current 62 minute timing down to something near the 50 minutes the 0745 Nenagh-Henry St bus takes. If more passengers can be attracted in Nenagh by a faster train than would be otherwise forgone, discontinue Birdhill (BE already serves Birdhill on the aforementioned 0745) and save a couple of minutes and some diesel on slowing down/accelerating there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
![]() heres the sunday tribune's piece
http://www.tribune.ie/news/home-news...on-collision-/ Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() FG going on about emissions but in fairness, if IE are operating a 2700 (2-car, not a 2750) over the line, that's 84 tonnes and 117 seats to carry not many people - the passenger/km emissions numbers must be substantial compared to a bus with the same load.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Limerick
Posts: 207
|
![]() I'd like to make a gentle prediction that 90% of the people who will call for these lines not to be closed won't have actually travelled on them in the last 2 years.
Last Autumn we were visiting a friend in Waterford and took the train from Limerick. It was absolutely woeful. My wife nearly got sick from the ride of the train, and I was feeling fairly ropey too by the time we reached Waterford. It is difficult to describe the snail's pace that this train travels at -- it just feels sort of humiliating. There I was, someone who is generally in favour of rail transport, crawling along watching cars whizzing past on the N24, feeling rotten. Haven't been between Waterford and Rosslare recently, but I assume it's the same. Went to Nenagh last year and that trip was also completely rotten. Coming back from Waterford on the bus (it was a Sunday) was a much better experience. We even had a snooze -- not something you'd manage on the train unless you had serious narcoleptic tendencies! I can honestly say that anyone travelling from Limerick to Waterford would be better off getting the bus -- even if there wasn't an interminable wait at the Junction. CIE/IE have been trying to close these lines for over 30 years. Have a look back at the Oireachtas archive and you'll see countless arguments against their closure. Those arguments have won the day, for now. But keeping railway lines open because they look good on the map isn't helping anyone if the service is slow, uncomfortable and depressing. Having said that, the best thing that IE could have done for these train lines is leak that they want to close them. Because that's the only time they ever get discussed. Who knows, one of these days we'll move beyond "don't close" and have a real discussion in this country about what we want those lines on a map to be for. PS Plumb Loco - your response seems a little over the top there -- all Thomas Stamp was doing was commenting on how IE have been wilfully trying to close the line through poor service -- the same criticism that I presume you would make yourself... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Quote:
What struck me was the numbers oft quoted of single digit passenger numbers bore no resemblance to the numbers I saw. The most telling information is during the January cold snap the trains where full as the train offered the only way in to work, that shows there are enough people in the catchment area to make it work. Given the Barrow Bridge advantage there is no faster way from most towns in south Wexford to Waterford While IE leaking this gets a debate going IE are the least likely organisation to take any form of postive action to address the problems, many of these problems are quite simple marketing and information issues. The ride isn't the greatest but people have quickly forgotten what 50mph on jointed track was like, that was the standard experience until quite recently. That CWR track is actually quite smooth and the 2700 railcars are the smoothest and quietest of the bunch.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 15-03-2010 at 21:26. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Quote:
as stated above there is a legal requirement to have a consulatation process, we will be at that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() One of the things that must be a serious cost on the line is the Barrow swing bridge. If New Ross Port was closed as part of a consolidation of the three southeast ports - given that about three quarters of its 2004 tonnage in fertilizer, zinc and oil is no more - then maybe the Barrow Bridge could be jacked up and fixed, as Shannonbridge was?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() I can't see any financal benefit, to replace the Barrow bridge would cost a fortune 3 or 4 times the cost of the Shannon bridge project
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
|
![]() I'm not familiar with the line at all but I wonder if the government would consider tendering out the operation of the line to a private company. They could take the railcars, subsidy and license from IR and offer them as a package to the operator. Line maintenance would remain with IR and some of the ticket sales would go to the government. Integrated ticketing with the rest of the IR network would be part and parcel because they wouldn't have any control over it.
A private company wouldn't have the baggage of IR and would have a strong incentive to operate a service people would want to use. IR would win because they'd lose a loss making service (but also lose the subsidy). They could probably reduce their costs by making some staff redundant or transferring them somewhere more productive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() I think the ascension of Sean Connick to ministerial rank will do more to concentrate IE's mind than any notional private entrant.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Thats more or less what Irish Rail are trying to do. But the government have yet to put in place the legal requirements to allow it.
Ideally let them take over Galway Rosslare, but someone will have to put up money to pay to run the service. Money + service specification => contract third party
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|