![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() The link to the Indo tells us very little other that that someone was "a danger to herself" and was apparently standing on the platform (!) at Connolly. Why the fleet of fire and ambulance vehicles in the accompanying photo?
Either the incident was much more dramatic than the normally sensationalist Indo related, or else there was a huge over-reaction to something which was on the face of it a very small scale affair (although I daresay traumatic for the idiividual involved). Is such large-scale disrpution inevitable or justified? Just asking. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() It was worse and no choice but to suspend services, the line was blocked for a time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() I understand the person was for a period of time on the track
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() The incident was initially thought to have been a fatality - hence the nature of the response and the suspension of services.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|