![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...269793618.html
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://www.irishrail.ie/projects/pdf/dartunderground/Meetings%20DART_03.pdf
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 431
|
![]() It's really disgraceful how IE are so relaxed about such a substantial delay.
They keep saying how important this project is, yet at the drop of a hat, they extend the completion date, and forget to tell their paymaster. I assume this will add significantly to the costs. All the projections for the PPP will need to be rewritten etc. I also wonder will the minister actually challenge IE on this? Finally, I do not believe planning delays alone would hold this project up by 3 years (> 1,000 days). They either had a massive miscalculation, or there is something else up which they are not telling us. Yet again, the public suffer, while IE fluff along.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() We have contacts in the project team and we are seeking clarification as to what happened but it looks like An Bord Pleanala has pulled a stunt of some kind.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() What is interesting here are the emerging facts
1. The DoT and NTA KNEW of 2018 last week 2. The consultation notices appeared last week so the delay was known, since there would be no need to consult if the plans had been finalised. 3. An Bord Pleanala seem to have told IE to go back to the drawing board. We will find out tonight if that is the case. Edit Seems ABP seem happy enough
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 06-05-2010 at 18:26. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 340
|
![]() Can IE appeal the decision? Seems ridiculous for this project to be blocked now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() I'll find out later what on earth is going on
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() ABP have certainly taken a look but I'm told there was no serious issues with the project
Plans are as before and the tunnel portal in Inchicore has been moved into the CIE site so no digging of the football field, beyond a small vent shaft
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 608
|
![]() It could be because Irish Rail made such a mess of the "consultation" by telling people what they were doing but not listening, that they were told to go back and do it properly. There is an EU convention called the Aarhus convention that is meant to be enacted in Ireland this year (10 years after it was agreed) that might be forcing this.
__________________
! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...270379242.html
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() So the previous 3-year delay is now followed up by a request for bids with the apparent implication that delays were not due to planning issues but due to a large (40%) increase in the amount of tunnelling.
So where does the truth lie? Also the new NTA would appear to be yet another pointless quango: what does it do which is not already done or sanctioned by the DoT, the D of Finance, the Planners or even CIE/IR. Most of these bodies never have real power to allocate resources: the Dept of Finance calls the shots on anything which has a € sign. Colm McCarthy's Bord Snip listed a pile of quangos to be hunted down and exterminated. Meanwhile the more of them are being created. The scipe for cunfusion and misunderstandings with so many bodies being involved must be huge. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() In fairness and without wanting to go off-topic, I doubt the Dublin Bus network review would be going ahead without the NTA.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() There is a construction delay as it will take longer
Planning wise IE can't move until the RPA have got approval on Metro North as there is a shared station at Stephen's Green which might force some changes on IE first The RPA have had a horrible time with the planning setup, ABP are not geared up for this level of project. IE have learned the lessons and will get through faster. The NTA sucked up the DTO and will take the taxi regulator in as well, so fewer agencies. The NTA will prove handy for us
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|