![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() wouldn’t be so urgently needed if the 2700s were serviceable, the idea of acquiring UK stock hadn’t been a dead end, and meanwhile the announced 41 22K middle units are still years from delivery...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
![]() If there's one thing to learn from the 2700s (and the 8200s), it's that buying a small stock of 10-12 coaches to bolster an existing fleet is a false economy.
Edit: Just realised that the 2700 fleet was 26 coaches, which is bigger than the 2600 fleet (17 coaches) or the 2800 fleet (10 coaches), so fleet size wasn't really the problem. However I think if one manufacturer had been used for all DMUs in the 1994-2000 period, it would have been a lot more viable to treat them as one class for servicing. Last edited by James Shields : 02-09-2019 at 09:12. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|