![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
![]() I think you forget that the NTA is responsible for all capital funding now - perhaps ask them?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() Has Irish Rail applied or do they no longer have any input ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() @berneyarms: OK, so that means that the NTA are useless. I could list other huge expenditures they are proposing, while neglecting ongoing facilities.
The capital/current distinction can be carried to absolutely ridiculous extremes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 602
|
![]() Quote:
The late delivery of the footbridge and direct interchange at Broombridge was down to NTA funding delays as I understand it. It’s very simplistic to blame the operating companies. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() There are plenty of stations with surplus TMVs, one could be moved and placed next to the Luas ones.
Stations with 4+ TMVs when likely in excess of 80% is Leap, Annaul or Free Travel is a poor uss of resources. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
![]() Quote:
However, aside from Heuston and Connolly, and maybe Pearse and Kent, I'm struggling to think of which ones might require that number. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
Grand Canal Dock does not need 4 TMVs, 2 is more than sufficient however it would be perfectly fine with 1 because even at peak hours only a handful of people use them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|