![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() The sick pay thing seems to be, from what I have read, a no risk thing legally for Transdev to do. Even if they are breeching the contract the only remedy the union has is to go the WRC or the Labour Court, which is where they already are. There seems to be a bit of clever PR by Transdev - the % of sick days is usually per employee, not the workforce as a whole and if you as an individual haven't gone over it they cant suspend you - and certainly not retrospectively. As SIPTU says, if they had done it they would be injuncted. Welcome to the 21st Century lads.
As for striking days pay deductions, I'm actually shocked that they have obviously been paid during their strike days up till now. There is no obligation on Transdev to do it. They may be breeching the contract of employment by deducting an entire days pay for a 4 hour stoppage, but again, the first port of call to settle these claims is the WRC/Labour court so there is pretty little the union can do at this moment. The whole thing has been a PR disaster from the union anyway. They lost this dispute in the eyes of the public from day one with the 52% thing (even though the Junior Doctors thing has been debunked its still commonly being accepted, along with the line that Luas drivers only slide a thing up and down). Transdev say they have no dosh, but they can afford to bid for Bus Routes. That'll be fun, search for Transdev on twitter and see what our UK neighbours have to say about their bus operations. Interesting few lines from an independent article last month: http://www.independent.ie/business/i...-34593180.html Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|