|
|
22-03-2011, 15:14
|
#5 |
|
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
Ehhhhhh, double edged sword. Ideally there would be dense development next to stops, served by feeder services. Ideally, in the absence of development along the southern half of the lines, its is the RPA that should have provided P&R - then it would capable of of being funded by the levies from eventual development.
__________________
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode