![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 707
|
![]() Quote:
But that is somewhat off-topic for this thread. I seem to recall some years ago, having read that concrete sleepers require a deeper ballast bed than older wood sleepers. Given the array of low bridges on that stretch, it doesn't seem practical to use concrete sleepers on ballast. So I just answered my own earlier question. I would also wonder why the speed limit will be (probably) no higher than 30Mph? It will certainly be a welcome improvement over the crawling pace movement over the section at present, but still, you'd think with new rails etc it would be better. Any curves etc can't be that bad! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 707
|
![]() One last question. When it said that the works were "to" the 3rd of January, do they mean exclusive or inclusive.
i.e. will services restart on the 3rd or the 4th? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() The kph/mph situation is irrelevant and has no bearing on passenger experiences. If anyone has a problem with Irish Rail's use of imperial measurements they can take it up with the European Rail Agency. There will be no further discussion on this topic
The line is tightly curved hence the speed limit
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 258
|
![]() Given the recent spate of appalling weather, Irish Rail are very lucky to have timed these works perfectly during a period of respite. There could have been delays for weeks if work had started but couldn't be completed on time due to poor weather.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|