![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Thats being worked on. Once the new signalling goes live the running costs will reduce further while punctuality and reliability are set to increase at the same time
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() LIT would be far better served if Longpavement halt was built - it would be 2km away but doable for most students over the trip into town and 3km trip back across the river, as well as match days for the Gaelic Grounds and Thomond Park. However, this likely stop won't get built while there is no money to regenerate the surrounding area.
Similarly, the problem with commuting to UL by rail from Nenagh is not arrival in town but the lack of a connector from Castleconnell or another new halt between there and Killonan. I thought Sixmilebridge wouldn't be open for another while yet because of signalling changes needed - did they fix that while the line was closed by the floods or was that never an issue? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0319/rail.html
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
|
![]() I wonder would it be possible to come to an agreement whereby the government commits to funding the extension if the councils in those eight "cities" agree to cover any loss made by the present and future WRC. If the line is successful, there should be no loss.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() My view is that Irish Rail should be obliged to publish boardings from each station annually, and the bottom 10% be told that unless x monthly or annual tickets are bought within six months, no more station for you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Quote:
just a sobering thought. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
![]() If you are talking 320 people per day and that means 160 each way, and assume two people per car, you are looking at removing 160 car journeys and replacing them with 10 train journeys.
Depending on whether they are 2 or 4 car trains, I would seriously doubt that the total amount of fuel consumed would be less. Especially when you add in the fuel used by staff to get into work. In fact you can probably assume that you are removing less than 100 car journeys because a lot of passengers would have either taken the bus or wouldn't have traveled at all because they are out for a jaunt on the free travel. I am not saying that there is no social need for the service, but you can forget about arguing for it based on green credentials. What they really need to do with these services is go all out in providing commuter services which means at least 4 trains to land you at the city ends between 07:30 and 09:00. And then the same again to get you home. Then don't bother with paid parking for at least the first few years and fill the trains up with daily commuters. I guess you would need to be using single car trains to provide this level of frequency given the population densities. Blowing 100 million quid and then ending up serving 320 people per day is just stupid. If you were commuting on the system in effect, they would have just invested 300 grand to get you into work. It would have been cheaper and greener to just buy you a house near where you work. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() We will issue a statement on Monday. Whats done is done, there is no going back. No one was willing to listen to sense and numbers.
On one level the biggest problem is the fact Irish Rail are running it, take a look at the timetable its the classic eccentric disjoint mess. You really wonder what kind of thought process is involved, sounds more like throwing darts blindfolded and looking at what options got hit. Now if Translink was running it, I would be confident that it would be more realistic in the operation, not to forget they understand the concept of 'customer'
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Ah, the wonderful BÉ route 343 Limerick - Shannon Airport http://www.buseireann.ie/pdf/1264783132-343.pdf Three services to Sixmilebridge in one direction and 5 the other. Only marginally worse than what the train service will be (nothing on Sunday).
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|