![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cork City/Midleton/Mallow
Posts: 211
|
![]() I presume this is not the renewal stage of the bridge? Anyone know when we can expect 5+ months delays & bus substitutions during the renewal, taking the works on the Cobh line a few years ago as my basis!
Could they not just base a 2 railcars between Carrig-on-Shannon and Sligo? Looking @ google maps, the distance between Carrig-on-Shannon and Dromod is just over 10miles (~18km). At least it would remove the ~90mins in a bus to Sligo! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 608
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Sligo doesn't have the staff or equipment to look after the trains for 10 days, 2-3 days no problem, beyond that trouble
Journey time wise it would be faster by bus than train- bus -train
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Was the bridge originally designed as double track. Surely they should just build a new deck and close the old one (moving trains are much more of a burden than stationary bridges).
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Its a single track bridge, the piers are wide enough but the current bridge is in the centre so it has to be lifted out first before a new one can go in
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://www.irishrail.ie/news_centre/general_news.asp?action=view&news_id=520
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() And its all been called off
Quote:
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() The IE Notice really does say "Sligo line Engineering works due to take place from 5th - 16th October have been deferred until furt by Corporate Communications"
When the hell is "furt"? (sounds rude rather than plain sloppy). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() Well, they corrected the typo yesterday pm. Good to see they read about their mistakes on this site!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 372
|
![]() Pity they don't spend a bit more time on their own site, rather than browsing the web. They still have "deffered" in the body of the notice (not to mention random capitalisation and lack of full stops).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|