![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
|
![]() This weeks Meath Chronicle
Wrong route with railway (Editor, Meath Chronicle) Dear sirs - So a senior Iarnrod Eireann manager has been removed from his post following his expressions of concern around the financial viability of reopening the railway from Pace to Navan (Meath Chronicle 19th Jan). Surely the real question however is why the group tasked with producing this report failed to recommend a route which could add in excess of 60 per cent to the catchment population of the line and so increase its viability. I`m speaking of the area to the east of the original alignment in South Meath, in particular the towns of Ratoath and Ashbourne. The combined population of these towns in the 2006 census was 15,777 persons in comparison to the 24,851 of Navan. With all public transport projects one of the primary concerns to the Department of Finance is not only the initial capital cost but the ongoing subvention levels required. In order to minimise that subvention it is necessary to maximise the railway`s catchment. If the railway is not to serve this area then it is difficult to see how it can be justified. Indeed a cheaper and more expedient solution using the freight-only branch from Drogheda should perhaps be re-examined. Yours, Mark Healy, Alderbrook Heath, Ashbourne. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() As the reported showed demand from Navan is very sensitive extra 10 minutes would seriously impact numbers
The 55+ million extra of course kills it as there isnt enough for the direct route anyway
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
|
![]() BTW, that €55m was only to bring it into Dunshaughlin, not over to Ashbourne
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||
Registered user
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
2030 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
|
![]() I'm wouldn't argue with that - it could well be 2030, could be longer. I wouldn't even put a date on it. We had the 1998 annoucement, the 2001 announcement, and the 2005 announcement. And still nothing has happened 10 years on but another report.
One thing is certain - it won't be done anytime soon. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered user
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
|
![]() And its a real shame that we have to think that. Shame on that whole bunch in Leinster house who haven't a clue and the conditioning they have inflicted on the likes of IE, RPA, DB and BE.
The Lambert puppet theatre (god bless them) aren't up to scratch, when compared to the biggest puppet show in Ireland....the one that has public transport puppets with longs strings stretching back to Kildare street. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
|
![]() I'd have to check but I think it is the only county town in Leinster without a railway.
Kildare, Naas, Portlaoise, Wicklow, Arklow, Drogheda, Dundalk, Tullamore, Mullingar, Dublin, etc are all rail served. Navan is not special but it is different. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 632
|
![]() Naas can hardly be described as having a railway connection seeing as it was torn up many years ago and the M7 built over it. Sallins is not Naas and the road between the two is choked with cars anytime I'm on it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, and a case in point is where Trim was the county town of Meath. But if you take Navan as a county town and the consider that the M1 is shadowed by a railway, the M4 is shadowed by a railway, the N/M7 is shadowed by a railway, and the N81 is shadowed by a rail, the you spot fairly quickly a sizeable gap on the parrallel N2/N3 north-east corridor which is not rail served. It's a gap in the map, full stop. I'm not arguing blindly for the Navan project. It's not even the most important project in county Meath, that honour goes to Dunboyne. but common sense means that it will happen, the question is when. Navan Drogheda would have been an ideal interim solution (interim being a long long time in an Irish context) but until the direct link is forced to a negative conclusion it just won't be considered. Point is that the sooner the direct link either comes off the fence on either the posative side or negative side then nothing will happen. Most people would bet on the negative side which would open the door to Navan Drogheda again, with the direct link being put back to a later timeframe. But until the process is exhausted that can't happen. The planning of the direct link has to be pushed forward to a conclusion to get to that point, otherwise there will never be a conclusion to the merry-go-round. Every campaign focuses on talking up a project. But not every campaign can expect a successful conclusion if it;s primary objective is not met. Even if Meath doesn't get Navan Clonsilla when the current process ends, it will at least be left with a fully open door to get Navan Drogheda. Ironically, campaigning for Navan Clonsilla may yet yield Navan Drogheda. None of us knows where this will lead to over the next few years. If I were to bet though I'd say the process will exhaust with a no to the direct route for now leading to Navan Drogheda for the interim, and Navan-Clonsilla at a later date (but a real later date). But again it doesn't really matter what any of us think - politics decides everything in the end |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|