![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Back using the car due poor service
Posts: 135
|
![]() That was a step forward I would say as I find the tone on this forum to be more anti-Irish Rail and it was good that you went to Drogheda. I'd have sympathy for the crew there more than anything else.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Challenge now is how to address this issue
Fact is even when the new trains come into service this class of problem will continue as the beer cans and other debris will continue to be wedged into the toilet by those upstanding members of society who think its fun. Sadly the modern toilet designs don't respond well to the mop and bucket routine and can require total replacement in some cases following the act of vandalism, several of the Dublin Cork trains have had brand new toilets fitted after various items where wedged into them We are left in a difficult situation, what is better Train has a defective toilet, does the train 1. Run at a reduced length if possible 2. Cancel and strand people 3. Run as normal Now while the issue at hand is not really Irish Rail's fault you can be very sure they can implement some proceedures which could reduce the scale of the issue Eliminating the yob/drinking culture off trains would be a good start
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Thank you, I'm only here because I'm a customer. If the service provider is running a service that is deficent it is the fault of the service provider.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 199
|
![]() If it is the case that modern toilets on trains don't lend themselves to a quick solution with a plunger and a mop then you have to question the design criteria that were used.
We all know that almost everywhere in the world you will get vandals trying to break things. If moving from the old hole in the floor model to super whizz bang toilets which can be blocked and put out of commission 3 minutes into a 3 hour journey is seen as progress then bring back the old days is what I say. I know we don't want to have raw sewage coating the rails (and your future garden furniture), but neither do we want to have toilets that can be decommisioned that easily and cause inconvenience to so many. z |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Quote:
Z is correct and right. I have never heard of a toilet that has to be replaced just because something gets stuck in it. Bad design choice led to this situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Back using the car due poor service
Posts: 135
|
![]() It appears I get a better service than others then... Largely I'm content but obviously there are problems. I've never found a perfect service provider to date...
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|