![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#41 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lovely Laois
Posts: 100
|
![]() Thanks for the lessons guys - it's good to learn something new every now and then.
Still pi$$ed off with Irish Rail ![]() Getting the 4:25 home today....checking twitter like mad & their website and praying nothing goes wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | ||
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
IMO expansion joints are important and they should be used as well as stressing the rails for different temperatures. Would yesterday of being different if we had them? Quote:
What's happening is that lots of patch work is being down and if they had the money I think some other intercity routes would be renewed but the department of transport seems to be busy building roads. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() By and Large, the Cork and Belfast lines have the oldest track, as they were the first to be renewed with CWR. Also they are the busiest and have 201 class locos on them at high speed, which I assume must add to track wear in a way that ICRs do not (higher axle-loads and unsprung weights).
As the other main intercity routes were renewed relatively recently and are relatively lightly trafficked, they will probably not need very much by way of serious relaying over the next decade: Dublin-Cork and Dublin-Belfast are likely to be the problem areas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() What do you call recently?
Remember only a few years ago Cork speeds were the same as all routes which had 201's running and as other lines are single they have much more ware, and cork tracks can take heaver trains. Portarlington to Athlone carries 30+ trains a day on a single track compared to most south of Portlaoise where two lines carry this. At the minute 201's are not used a lot on Cork route, half are ICR's. Last edited by Jamie2k9 : 10-07-2013 at 15:58. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Some parts of Cork-Dublin first received CWR in the early 1980s, but I don't know if any of that rail remains. The bulk of the work done in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
While track / rail condition will have an effect on speeds, alignment (primarily curvature, but at higher speeds also vertical curvature) and line features (level crossings, over bridges with limited clearance and poor under bridges / track formation) will have greater implications.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 395
|
![]() Quote:
They also promised to review procedures and the supply of information to passengers when incidents like these occur. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
I see no reason why 60 minutes to clear the machine, it failed before 15.00, immediate action would be dispatch a locomotive from Heuston, use single line out of Nass, Inbound line wouldn't of being overly busy and then move the machine to New bridge or Kildare or even return to the loop in Nass. This absolute bulls**t that maintenance staff are on site trying to fix the fault is just causing more problems and getting very little productive done until they realize it can't be fixed. If something fails in the middle of nowhere the probability of it being fixed there and then is very slim. Over the while we have had: 10.00 to Cork failure at Newbridge, 2 hours to clear. Westport train failure which too around 3 hours to get another 22k to push it to Newbridge. Track machine fail south of Kildare which took 3 hours+ to use a locomotive sitting in Kildare to move it. The management have the brass neck to say we will review procedures. This just blatant lies as they have being saying this for years. DO they think passengers are mugs. This will happen again and the 3 hour and 4 hour delays will not change. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|