![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
DART runs on an exclusive right of way on the authority of signals and the backup of automatic train protection. In contrast Luas drivers must be ever vigilant for pedestrians and vehicles. Observance of signals is entirely dependent on the driver and the consequences of a mistake can be very immediate. The speed of a LUAS tram is comparable to DART , the latter rarely exceeds 45 mph and averages less than 20 mph, not dramatically different to a LUAS. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 258
|
![]() The Luas drivers can't seriously be expecting a 50% pay rise. Many of them will have been taken on in the depths of the recession, grateful for the job. It sounds appealing when someone tells you that you deserve to be paid the same as some other group, but a few days of lost pay and the strike will probably start to crumble.
Teachers (and other groups) who started employment in the last few years will be earning a lot less than those doing the same job who began earlier, but that's just the way it is, and as a cohort, they are less likely to be saddled with debt. Unemployment is still high enough for there to be plenty of others grateful for the Luas work. Of course, the other side is are Irish Rail drivers paid too much? I imagine they will want the Luas strike to be over as quickly as possible, because it draws attention to them. Did I read somewhere it is €60k a year and a guaranteed public sector final salary scheme? There's plenty who'd be very happy with that. Last edited by Eddie : 11-02-2016 at 23:27. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() It should be noted, there was no recession at Transdev, an increase was paid out in the darkest days of the recession, no increases in CIE in years
I don't particularity think Irish Rail drivers are over or underpaid, but if Luas gets a large lump of an increase there will be a push to restore the pay gap with Irish Rail. Luas staff will be lucky to get 1.5% a year which is a hell of lot more than what many have seen over the last 5 years. SIPTU must be living on a different planet, Transdev is not going to pay out, it doesn't have the infinite CIE overdraft. Sustained strike action will result in a loss of 100k a day on Transdev and risk of contract termination by the NTA. You might end up with Irish Rail or Dublin Bus being asked to act as interim managers while a tender is issued
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 12-02-2016 at 06:08. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() this is the thing, transdev are not CIE, they are a private company providing a service under a contract issued by the NTA. I assume that behind the trading name the contracts are between the NTA and a subsidiary company set up to run luas so there may be no question of saying its a multinational company with endless reserves of cash.
maybe SIPTU is misreading the figures, because there is no automatic correlation between increase in passenger numbers and profit for the company, i would have thought that they would have been better off looking for a form of inflation based index linked plus a percentage. that said there is nothing that annoys me more than "they're lucky to have a job" and "there's plenty in the dole queues waiting to take their jobs" - just because there may be doesn't give n employer carte blance to run your employment rights into the ground or deny you the right to take perfectly legal action to resolve a grievance. that path leads to slave labour. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() For the record Luas is operated by Transdev Dublin Light Rail Limited, which is owned by its parent.
Transdev does have some control over its payments owing to the contract targets. So of the beat the performance targets they do get a limited financial benifit. So for example there is a carrot and stick thing for fare evasion, above a certain level penalty, below a certain level bonus
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() Looking at to-day's main newspapers, all they have are (a) shock-horror headlines about traffic chaos; (b) lots of special pleading from SIPTU guys; (c) no critical analysis of said SIPTU guys and (d) a few quotes from management.
There is no analysis of pay with other related jobs (DB), no analysis of the contractual relations between TransDev, NTA, etc. Nothing approaching the interesting and relevant contributions on this site. The journos don't even have the energy to do a few elementary Google searches. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() This seems to be more about the election (and 'The Revolution') than a genuine negotiation for a pay increase.
While pay increases over the last 8 year might be modest, the cost of living is in the same place as then. Train drivers wanted to be treated the same as airline pilots, tram drivers want to be treated the same as train drivers and there is a suggestion that bus drivers will lodge a pay claim to match tram drivers.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() 8 and 17 March are the next dates.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Transdev are now at serious risk of contract termination through non performance.
I can see this dragging on and on and Transdev are not going to negotiate until SIPTU adopts a financially realistic position.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Quote:
I cannot see the contract been terminated at all, simple fact is if they terminate it they will find it difficult to get another company in to operate with such demands. The NTA know the consequences of for example letting CIE manage short term combined with the additional cost a new operator will demand to meet wage demands. The sync in me think's SIPTU were expecting it to be resolved before the election and now that has not happened they have been forced to give another 3 weeks notice and once this week's over it will almost be forgotten it will become a non issue and they will have to be realistic at some point. Now they have opted for single days as they know next to nobody is on there side. What would be the chances of unions agreeing to 3 week notice within CIE? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() the problem with doing this during an election from SIPTU's point of view is that Transdev/NTA isnt CIE. the tactic of pressurising the minister to intervene either overtly or in the background isnt going to work.
choosing st patricks day and days of matches and so on also sounds grand on paper but it is 100% capable of severe backlash, with passengers going from innocent bystanders to deliberate victims of the striking workers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() On the day of the latest strike, the "paper of record" has a piece by the same journalist with a photo of the same SIPTU driver and the following headline: "Luas drivers say they have been grossly underpaid".
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/irela...paid-1.2528698 Once again, no real analysis or pay comparisons, just a lot of hot air from drivers and passengers alike. Pathetic. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() That is dated last Wednesday 10th!
Luas TMV had stickers indicating a strike this week, much more visable than last week. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() Jamie2k9: You are right about the 10th. But when I looked at to-day's online IT, that piece was featured. It shows that not only do they do terrible reporting, they recycle it!
The same newspaper is now running election reports from a "representative" sample of 10 (!!). A sample of that size is enough to make any statistician want to tear his hair out. How can we rely on these guys for news about anything? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
![]() Unions generally don't feel that public support is necessary to a claim but they might be badly wrong on this one. To be looking for a 50% pay rise and benefits such as 30 - 45 minutes shorter drive time is quite seriously odd.
I'd say the majority of passengers would rather grin and bear the strikes than pay the inevitable fare increases if the Luas operational costs increased by 19 million euro. If that figure is to be taken on face value (and that is a big if), the cost increase represents 50 cent per passenger journey. Somebody has to pay this - it won't be Transdev, so that leaves either the taxpayer or the fare payer. It seems to be the height of irresponsibility to escalate to two day strikes on this sort of demands so quickly. The only way they can ratchet up the pressure now is to go all out which can't last long before drivers start running out of euros. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 258
|
![]() Although only an ad-hoc LUAS user myself, I trust that those who have monthly or annual tickets will be able to claim for strike days, in the same way that those who were affected by the Bus strikes last May were. (I was reimbursed €5.50 per day for 2 days, which at least partially offset the Aircoach ticket I had to buy.)
Last edited by Eddie : 18-02-2016 at 21:22. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Both drivers who are shop stuarts were on RTE saying they want the fare revenue released it generates and they do not want taxpayers money
Not sure how such data will help. There was also speculation that the company may shut down Luas services until it was resolved. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Its totally irrelevant
Transdev would still get paid if only 1 passenger showed up tomorrow. They are paid to provide a service laid out in the specification, the farebox is separate function If the Luas was loss making, or say RPA/TII decided to operate for a week for zero fares. Transdev would still get paid the agreed rate in full.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
![]() Easter Sunday/Monday added, other grades have ended work to rule however drivers have ended the unofficial action after they were threatened with legal action.
SIPTU have moved onto IE as well, DART drivers have voted, will that mean all other will drivers striking as well? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|