![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Limerick
Posts: 207
|
![]() When I get an early train from Limerick to Dublin, I normally have a bit of a need for some coffee (however awful it is).
The new trains on the Limerick Dublin route are two 3-coach railcars stuck together. Of course the trolley can't travel between the two halves, so if I sleepily get on the wrong set, I don't get any coffee until Thurles (where they hump the trolley off one half and hump it on to the other half). This makes me a bit cranky. So my question: is the long term plan to regularly stitch two 3-coach railcars together, or are they just doing that for testing purposes until a new timetable hits? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 309
|
![]() I'd say thats annoying alright.
They should have ordered more 6-car sets, then they wouldn't have to stitch two 3-car sets together. It dosen't look right either |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 707
|
![]() My thoughts exactly, too many 3 car sets and too few 6s. I've thought that since the start. Better get used to it
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() The 6-car sets will be targeted at peak loadings, 3-car sets at off-peak loadings. Dual 3-cars sets would hopefully be restricted to Friday /Sunday evening peak loadings.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Ideally we would see split services - for example leaving Heuston as a 6 car with the front 3 going to Carlow and 3 to Athlone - to improve utilisation of slots and platforms at major termini. Whether IE would ever do such a thing is another matter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
IT Officer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
|
![]() That fails the Irish travel intelligence test, sadly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() When I travel from Toronto to Kingston for work, my usual train is a combination of a locohauled Montreal train and a locohauled Ottawa train (not sure which is in front - I get off before it matters).
This makes sense because it is a single deck long range train which is then occupying one platform at Toronto Union and not also a second one which is instead occupied by a GO Transit train with up to 12 bilevel cars with about 150 seats each. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Fair point Victor but they wouldn't necessarily have to wait, it would just be less efficient at the terminus to have two arrivals - a 25% movement reduction from 2 in 2 out to only 2 in 1 out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 131
|
![]() Excuse my ignorance, but in this situation are both drivers timetabled to stay with the train even after it has joined? Otherwise I guess you wouldn't have the option for a delayed half to continue to the terminus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|