![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() No surprise here
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by markpb : 06-06-2007 at 15:15. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
|
![]() Quote:
Resident south of Bray (Greystones or Wicklow, or even Arklow/Gorey for example) works in Sandyford, or Cherrywood, or whatever. Joining the Luas Green Line to the Dart at this point makes sense in terms of linking Co. Wicklow commuters to other parts of the city. Greystones - Bray (DART), change at Bray to continue by Luas to Cherrywood is a perfectly reasonable demand - yes you can do it by shuttle bus or by driving to a station car park but it's harder to persuade commuters to make the switch when it's like that. The real madness would be to have a Luas line going south from the city centre via Cherrywood to Fassaroe and a train line going south from the city centre to the south-east via Bray centre (about a mile, two miles from Fassaroe?) without connecting them. Convincing Wicklow commuters to take the train instead of the N11 would be more difficult if they had to make their own way between Luas and train - so close yet so far! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
Mind DeGappe. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
![]() That does seem excessive, but I applaud the idea of having the second extension lined up for the contractors to move on to as soon as the first is finished.
I wonder if the same could happen at the other end, and have the Liffey Junction extension ready to start as soon as the city centre link-up is finished. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered user
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
|
![]() Are we correct in assuming that the existing Brides Glen viaduct is being used? (according to that article) The RPA had suggested that a new crossing was being built. The approach to the existing viaduct is a tad difficult. but not impossible. Personally speaking (and P11 made this point to the RPA) the use of existing infrastructure was far more preferable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Oddly enough, it is only on the DoT website, no the RPA one. Teh last few lines of the PR reeks of "we're taking all the glory, but doing none of the work". Shenanigans (to keep ministerial office?).
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
|
![]() At least no mention yet of the guided bus they were harping on about to form the connection between the two modes. It was mooted in the Bray LUTS. The Woodbrook connection is more feasible but the Bray connection penetrates the town and would provide a larger passenger number increase. It would also serve the Bray Town centre development which currently is mired in red tape and flood defence issues.
Quote:
its a pity the route is not traversing the Cherrywood Roundabout and straight over the Bridge. Its probably routed south of it to connect to the planned Cherrywood Town Centre. Last edited by Mark : 07-06-2007 at 15:08. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 29
|
![]() I went up to have a look in the best tradition of informed engineering.
While the approach from Cherrywood has its own routing problems, it appears to be workable. What I was interested in was the other side, where the line appears to go between ongoing development (houses being built *very* close to the west side of the line), existing houses & gardens and on the east side a sports ground. From those P11ers who have been there before, do they think there's enough room to go between the sports ground and the houses, or is there a CPO in the offing? I can't see clearly from the map where exactly it goes. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Massive CPO if they go with the Bray town option
Carlisle Grounds would have a lump taken off them. Irish Rail likely to oppose since the patch behind the grounds has a 38Kv DART substation Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 16-06-2007 at 12:41. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 41
|
![]() Quote:
by the way, i assume when these extensions are open, there'll be extra rolling stock and sandyford only trams at rush hour, especially in the morning? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() If the LUAS goes to the DART - maybe there might be "necessary engineering changes" at the station similar to what was mentioned in the Greystones thread about properly converting Bray to a through station
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
New to the board
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 27
|
![]() In relation to the 38Kv substation it could be moved 100 metres onto the golf club lands that are going to accomadate the massive new shopping centre.A condition could even be attached to the planning permission that the developers have to give IE the necessary land for their substation (around 40 metres squared?).
The pylons for the D.A.R.T. could be put on one side of the track only, like in Seapoint D.A.R.T station. A road tunnel instead of the level crossing outside Bray D.A.R.T. station was first mooted in the 1860's if it were built now it would replace the footbridge and give space to the LUAS to come right up to DART station. As far as I know the old Cash and Carry opposite Bray DART station is derelict,it could be CPOed for a carpark to replace the one lost. The supports of the bridge over the river Dargle are larger then the deck. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 180
|
![]() if they can move the substation theres plenty of room to build a luas station where the small station carpark is currently (just beside the level crossing) - formerly a cattle bank i think. Line could then run over a new (or widened) bridge parallel to the DART line and around the edge of the proposed golf club development.
the level crossing is never that busy - I don't see why it couldn't be closed entirely - theres numerous alternative routes to the seafront. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Substation can be moved, its only 20 feet from the railway to the wall of Carlisle grounds at the north end, it won't fit unless you take the Carlisle grounds as well
But ones with 5m clearance ??, a double decker fits under one bridge only and its a one way |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|