[16-11-2006] Heuston after 18:30 - Page 2

Mark Gleeson · 18-11-2006, 11:05

The word is that the 19:00 did not suffer a brake failure, she was never in a position to operate a passenger service on the evening of the 16th

Not going to reveal why, the ball is in IE's court to admit it let us see how honest there are in there investigation

sandraoh · 20-11-2006, 13:22

I'm pretty sure the posters in the station say thursday 17th not 16th

Thomas J Stamp · 20-11-2006, 13:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandraoh

I'm pretty sure the posters in the station say thursday 17th not 16th

Would someone quickly get down there and take a photo of those posters, please?

Pretty Please?

Top hat smiley as a prize as your sig.

sandraoh · 20-11-2006, 14:56

i do have my camera with me today so I'll try...
mayber hide this thread til then?

Mark Gleeson · 20-11-2006, 15:25

Got the photo

sandraoh · 20-11-2006, 15:29

So i am that observant then?

2Funki4Wheelz · 20-11-2006, 15:35

IE Proofreader should've gone to Specsavers...

Mark Gleeson · 20-11-2006, 15:38

Indeed

Zero points to IE if they can't spell what hope, there is of course a another error in the notice itself

Mark Gleeson · 20-11-2006, 16:57

Since IE have now seen our photo, what odds on the poster being removed?

2Funki4Wheelz · 20-11-2006, 17:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Gleeson

Since IE have now seen our photo, what odds on the poster being removed?

Fair chance but consider the fact they didn't take the opportunity to fix the route/root error previously highlighted here when the apology went on the website.

20-11-2006, 13:22	#22
sandraoh Regular Poster Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Portlaoise Posts: 145	I'm pretty sure the posters in the station say thursday 17th not 16th __________________

20-11-2006, 14:56	#24
sandraoh Regular Poster Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Portlaoise Posts: 145	i do have my camera with me today so I'll try... mayber hide this thread til then? __________________ Last edited by sandraoh : 20-11-2006 at 14:56. Reason: hiding bit

20-11-2006, 15:29	#26
sandraoh Regular Poster Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Portlaoise Posts: 145	So i am that observant then? __________________

20-11-2006, 15:35	#27
2Funki4Wheelz Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Portarlington Posts: 397	IE Proofreader should've gone to Specsavers... __________________ Customer Service costs nothing...

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

18-11-2006, 11:05	#21
Mark Gleeson Technical Officer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Coach C, Seat 33 Posts: 12,669	The word is that the 19:00 did not suffer a brake failure, she was never in a position to operate a passenger service on the evening of the 16th Not going to reveal why, the ball is in IE's court to admit it let us see how honest there are in there investigation

20-11-2006, 15:38	#28
Mark Gleeson Technical Officer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Coach C, Seat 33 Posts: 12,669	Indeed Zero points to IE if they can't spell what hope, there is of course a another error in the notice itself

20-11-2006, 16:57	#29
Mark Gleeson Technical Officer Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Coach C, Seat 33 Posts: 12,669	Since IE have now seen our photo, what odds on the poster being removed?