Rail Users Ireland Forum

Go Back   Rail Users Ireland Forum > General Information & Discussion > Events, Happenings and Media
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 20-10-2006, 16:52   #21
weehamster
Member
 
weehamster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cathair Bhaile Átha Cliath
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel Fitzgricer
I am in the US at the moment working and I checked the UTV news site on the off chance and lo and behold Dublin is to get a brilliant metro north with an ace, integrated route route.

However, I think UTV has posted a world exclusive preview of the rolling stock to be used. Do you think it'll be carrying beet as well as commuters?

http://u.tv/newsroom/indepth.asp?id=77410&pt=n
What a beauty.

Though to be honest, the tram pictures on the RPA Metro North Map arent good looking either.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MetroTram 01.JPG (6.1 KB, 914 views)
File Type: jpg MetroTram 02.JPG (6.3 KB, 846 views)
File Type: jpg MetroTram 03.JPG (6.5 KB, 941 views)
File Type: jpg MetroTram 04.JPG (6.0 KB, 901 views)
__________________
R.I.P. T21 Eradicate Fianna Fáil (Totally)
weehamster is offline  
Unread 21-10-2006, 11:18   #22
Mark
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
Default

They are just citadis luas pics!
Mark is offline  
Unread 21-10-2006, 17:55   #23
James Shields
Member
 
James Shields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
They are just citadis luas pics!
I don't think they're Luas pics. I would expect the RPA have a 3D model of a possible Metro vehicle (though the exact vehicle won't be known until after the tender process), which is presumably based on Luas.
James Shields is offline  
Unread 22-10-2006, 17:34   #24
weehamster
Member
 
weehamster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cathair Bhaile Átha Cliath
Posts: 199
Default

If you look carefull at picture 3 you can see Ballymun flats in the background. Now this could be from the aule Dundrum to Sillogue Luas line but I doubt it.
Now RPA were quoted saying that the metro tram will look very similar to the Luas tram.
__________________
R.I.P. T21 Eradicate Fianna Fáil (Totally)
weehamster is offline  
Unread 23-10-2006, 08:31   #25
Mark
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lostcarpark
I don't think they're Luas pics. I would expect the RPA have a 3D model of a possible Metro vehicle (though the exact vehicle won't be known until after the tender process), which is presumably based on Luas.
Yeah they are, fairly obvious I thought.
Mark is offline  
Unread 23-10-2006, 12:14   #26
tomf
New to the board
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: wicklow
Posts: 7
Default Metro and Dart interchange

Any planned new rail system should be routed with multiple numbers of points of interchange with existing public transport nodes, in particular those that coincide with high capacity suburban and regional/national transport nodes.

The new route chosen for Metro North is welcome to the extent that departs from the original publicised route and will now coincide with Drumcondra station serving the Maynooth suburban line (planned Greystones-Maynooth DART)

As previously publicised, the fact that it will also concide with the new interconnector at St. Stephens Green linking with the Kildare suburban line (planned Balbriggan-Hazelhatch Dart) and will have direct links with both Red and Green Luas is welcome but nothing more than one would expect from a planned network.

It is my view however that the route should interchange directly with the DART at Tara Street DART Station which is the busiest suburban rail station in Dublin.

Given that a direct single station interchange appears to be off the agenda, a second best approach could be simply achieved by routing an underground pedestrian tunnel between the new 'landmark' underground station' at O' Connell Bridge to an area within the curtilage of Tara Street Station allowing interchange in relative comfort and with minimal 'perceived' distance between the points of interchange. This is the approach that appears to have been adopted with the pedestrian tunnel to the Luas at Abbey Street.

A clearly delineated foot passage between O'Connell Bridge station and Tara Street Dart would make interchange more comfortable for Irish passengers and international visitors and further incentivise public transport over private.

Rail travel experience in London, New York, Munich, Frankfort, Berlin, Toronto, Montreal is made simple by ease of interchange between international/suburban/metro/underground/tram with frequent direct foot passages between routes even where there are relatively significant distances between them (between 400 and 600m). The perception is that the lines are relatively close as you are not subjected to 'surfacing' amongst shoppers etc. If opportunities for interchange are not made easy and comfort within stations is not maximised, the optimisation of passenger numbers and full benefits of our investment will not be achieved.

Where maximum distances between Metro and rail or Metro and DART interchanges are of the order of maximum 3/400m by foot and are clearly delineated by underground tunnel from within DART/Rail/Metro/Luas stations highest passenger usage between services will be achieved.
tomf is offline  
Unread 23-10-2006, 13:40   #27
Donal Quinn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 267
Default



i knew this map would come in handy!

i take your points about integration of public transport but i fail to see the benefit in your specific proposal.

tara is in between pearse and connolly on the DART 2 line - given that there is already a "barrier-free" (we are told) interchange with the metro (aka orange luas) and the DART 2 at drumcondra. surely there is no need for a direct link between O'Connell bridge and Tara st which is not itself an interchange station although the stations before and after it are...

Last edited by Donal Quinn : 23-10-2006 at 13:49.
Donal Quinn is offline  
Unread 23-10-2006, 14:32   #28
tomf
New to the board
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: wicklow
Posts: 7
Default

Whilst there will be an interchange between the Metro and Dart 1 at St. Stephens Green and Metro and Dart 2 at Drumcondra I would firstly argue that the more opportunities there are for customer friendly ease of transfer at interchange points between the various rail options (and the other travel modes) the better. When the whole network is complete it is not 'essential' that these 2 stations are linked but the more choices people have the better. If its not made easy people won't do it.

Secondly, it looks likely that the government (and also opposition parties) have invested sufficient energy, enthusiasm and commitment into this project that it is unlikely to be reversed, with the metro section to the airport completed at a very minimum. However, despite its obvious and clear merits, the future of the interconnector is less certain and the minister has given little away in terms of guaranteeing its delivery. There is a planned minimum timelag of 3 years between completing the Metro and the electrification of the suburban lines and completion of the interconnector. The likelihood is that there will be an even greater timelag in its delivery and therefore no interchange between Metro and the existing Dart network (Malahide/Howth to Bray/Greystones) for a minimum of 5+ years.

A small investment, during Metro construction phase, constructing an underground foot passage between the 'landmark' underground city Metro station and the busiest Dart station on the network would make obvious sense and assist customers during the interm period and make ease of transfer easier. It would obviously be benificial in the longer term also. It could hardly be negative.

Short terms and simple solutions, similar to the temporary Docklands station (or the reopening of the Phoenix Park tunnel to passenger traffic!), make sense. If during the intervening period there are poor connections between Metro and Dart. That would be short sighted.
tomf is offline  
Unread 23-10-2006, 15:30   #29
2Funki4Wheelz
Member
 
2Funki4Wheelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portarlington
Posts: 397
Default

Excellent news, especially for a proper Airport system and for Swords where I used to live (which is huuuge now). We were getting the DART 'soon', when I was kid (mid-late eighties). Maybe this time something really will happen.
__________________
Customer Service costs nothing...
2Funki4Wheelz is offline  
Unread 24-10-2006, 22:31   #30
markpb
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Gleeson
# Santry Demesne
Station to serve development here. However development is also taking place on the opposite side of the link road and the RPA envisage a new pedestrian bridge to link metro station with it.
Do you know where this stop is, exactly? Santry Demense is a pretty big place :-) I'd hope it would be somewhere around Swords Road / Coolock Lane junction so it would connect with the orbital 17A but I'm guessing it's somewhere further north around Crown Plaza?
markpb is offline  
Unread 25-10-2006, 00:00   #31
Derek Wheeler
Registered user
 
Derek Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
Default

Its effectively in Ballymun.

Santry Demense runs from the old N1 near Santry stadium (Crown Plaza) back towards Ballymun. The Metro station will be located alongside the link road from Ballymun to the M50 junction.(The road that runs from Collins Avenue through Ballymun and towards the M50.) At the moment its a relative no-mans land, but apparently development is planned.
Derek Wheeler is offline  
Unread 25-10-2006, 13:05   #32
Colm Donoghue
Really Regular Poster
 
Colm Donoghue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 873
Default

Is the "Ballymun" stop then to be south of where the old roundabout was, the santry demesne then north of Santry avenue( and the new and improved higher than the old highrise ballymun tower) in the vicinity of where ikea was planned to go and metropark to be north of the m50? with a degree of vagueness about where exactly these will go?

Is "link road from Ballymun to the M50 junction" not the Ballymun road really? I would have always considered it to be so from the m50 to the met office.
Colm Donoghue is offline  
Unread 25-10-2006, 14:58   #33
markpb
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
Default

Is there any chance the metro north trains will be driverless? I'm just back from Paris and noticed that the (relatively) new line 14 operates this way. The platforms have platform edge automatic doors, similar to the jubilee line in London and the train is completely staff free.
markpb is offline  
Unread 25-10-2006, 16:19   #34
Derek Wheeler
Registered user
 
Derek Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colmd
Is the "Ballymun" stop then to be south of where the old roundabout was, the santry demesne then north of Santry avenue( and the new and improved higher than the old highrise ballymun tower) in the vicinity of where ikea was planned to go and metropark to be north of the m50? with a degree of vagueness about where exactly these will go?
Exactly.
Derek Wheeler is offline  
Unread 25-10-2006, 18:18   #35
janda
New to the board
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markpb
Do you know where this stop is, exactly? Santry Demense is a pretty big place :-) I'd hope it would be somewhere around Swords Road / Coolock Lane junction so it would connect with the orbital 17A but I'm guessing it's somewhere further north around Crown Plaza?
I live in Northwood at the moment so I have an interest (but I suspect i won't be living here by the time the metro opens )


From what I read they intend going up the east side of Ballymun Road, so they may have an alignment along the old road (directly outside the entrance to Northwood)- it may minimise traffic disruption.
janda is offline  
Unread 25-10-2006, 21:01   #36
markpb
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
Default

The RPA have a decent looking map of the proposed station sites.
markpb is offline  
Unread 26-10-2006, 08:40   #37
Colm Donoghue
Really Regular Poster
 
Colm Donoghue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 873
Default

I guess this is really too late to add any comment, but the Griffith avenue station should really be between Grifith ave. and Homefarm road to maximize it's catchement. having it where it is will only have a catchment on one side. not too many people from the farm gonna be getting the metro...
Colm Donoghue is offline  
Unread 26-10-2006, 08:55   #38
Mark
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
Default

Name:  griffith.JPG
Views: 969
Size:  7.1 KB
Mark is offline  
Unread 26-10-2006, 08:56   #39
Mark Gleeson
Technical Officer
 
Mark Gleeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
Default

The Griffith Rd stop is built on or adjacent to a plot of land owned by DCU which is being developed into a second campus

Given the route of the tunnel its about the only place it could go

If you draw the 10 minute walking circle around the stops you should find they overlap
Mark Gleeson is offline  
Unread 18-11-2006, 08:57   #40
Navan Junction
Really Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Navan
Posts: 305
Default

RPA to rethink Ballymun section of Metro North
Tim O'Brien, Irish Times, 18.11.2006

The Railway Procurement Agency (RPA) is to re-examine its preferred options for routing Dublin's Metro North through Ballymun.

The 17km (10.6-mile) metro is set to take passengers underground from St Stephen's Green to Dublin City University (DCU) where it will rise to street level, and pass along the central median on Ballymun Road and Ballymun Main Street.

When the route was announced last month, the RPA said it was considering three options for the Ballymun section. These included an on-street design, an elevated design and putting the line in a trench along the middle of the road.

However, following opposition from locals, The Irish Timesunderstands the RPA has agreed to consider scrapping all three options to continue the metro underground until it has passed Ballymun and possibly the M50.

Labour transport spokeswoman Róisín Shortall revealed senior RPA executives met with local councillors, TDs and executives of Ballymun regeneration this week to work out a solution.

Ms Shortall said there were serious difficulties with all of the original RPA options. In relation to the on-street design, the route would traverse three major intersections in the area of Main Street. " . . . And you cannot have a high-speed train crossing three junctions at the lights," she said.

In relation to the elevated proposal, Ms Shortall said it was impractical to put the train "looking in the first-floor windows of homes" while issues would arise in relation to the space under the line which could give rise to anti-social behaviour.

In relation to the trench proposal, she said there were safety issues for pedestrians and trains. The RPA is to revert to the groups on Tuesday with further proposals.

According to Ms Shortall, a solution which does not involve any of the original three put forward by the RPA is a must if the project is to be successful. "You simply can't spend €3 billion on a high-speed train and then ruin its effectiveness by asking it to stop three times in a short section for junctions with road traffic."

Similarly, she said, it was not realistic to expect people in Ballymun to put up with an elevated or trench section when it could be put underground elsewhere along the route. Metro North is expected to complete its journey from St Stephen's Green to Dublin airport in 17 minutes, arriving at Swords in 26 minutes.
Navan Junction is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.