Enterprise fleet refurbishment

seamus kilcock · 10-05-2016, 07:09

Use the Bus - it's seriously more reliable.
Time difference - assuming train is on time - 10/20 minutes extra using Bus.

James Howard · 10-05-2016, 08:28

I wonder if it would be worth somebody trying a first class bus or a first class section on the bus. I've was on something similar in Korea years ago.

My personal objection to taking buses for my commute is that there isn't enough room to work on a 15" laptop on a bus. If they had 3 seats across and a table, there would be enough room. Would it more be cost-effective than the train to run a bus at such density? I'm guessing you'd get the equivalent of 40 passengers on a tri-axle.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-05-2016, 07:09	#1
seamus kilcock Regular Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 103	Use the Bus - it's seriously more reliable. Time difference - assuming train is on time - 10/20 minutes extra using Bus.

10-05-2016, 08:28	#2
James Howard Really Really Regluar Poster Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Sligo Line Posts: 1,115	I wonder if it would be worth somebody trying a first class bus or a first class section on the bus. I've was on something similar in Korea years ago. My personal objection to taking buses for my commute is that there isn't enough room to work on a 15" laptop on a bus. If they had 3 seats across and a table, there would be enough room. Would it more be cost-effective than the train to run a bus at such density? I'm guessing you'd get the equivalent of 40 passengers on a tri-axle.