28-08-2009, 12:50 | #141 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
28-08-2009, 13:18 | #142 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
|
|
28-08-2009, 14:05 | #143 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lusk
Posts: 112
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/n...nd/8222435.stm
Quote:
|
|
28-08-2009, 14:32 | #144 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
Urgent tender out by irish rail for frequent coach service on the Northern line
http://www.etenders.gov.ie/search/sh...x?ID=AUG125976 Quote:
|
|
28-08-2009, 17:01 | #145 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 54
|
well what about the rumour that the ~4 o'clock driver noticed something wrong and reported it?
|
28-08-2009, 18:13 | #146 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Good news is a platform with crane is currently being towed out of Dublin Port odds are its for Malahide
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
28-08-2009, 18:56 | #147 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
Update
__________________
|
01-09-2009, 16:54 | #148 |
IT Officer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
|
Today the 1750 Pearse-Malahide is running all stations to Malahide, instead of non-stop from Connolly to Howth Junction. Running as a DMU (4-car 2800) means it'll be slower than the DART.
|
01-09-2009, 16:56 | #149 |
IT Officer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
|
And left 5 minutes late, packed to the gills. Nearly didn't leave at all after an apparent brake issue.
|
01-09-2009, 17:01 | #150 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Probably filling in for the broken DART
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
02-09-2009, 19:28 | #151 |
New to the board
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
|
Near disaster and the National Emergency Plan
I have not seen any comments about what would have happened had the train crashed over the estuary.The potential disaster would be of a scale where the National Emergency Plan would have to be invoked.
Fingal County Council are the lead organization according to the plan.Does anybody know how emergency services could access the disaster site when each side is covered in tidal water ? None of the emergency agencies have amphibious vehicle. I suspect we would have to rely on the Coastguard and the RNLI to help out with inflatable boats as road access is non existant.Thats a big ask for eight carraiges full of people . Does anyone know what resources would be suitable and available for a rail disaster over a bridge in this country? That is something to think about next time when you are travelling on Irish Rail over a viaduct !! |
02-09-2009, 20:41 | #152 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
Without wanting to distract from the sensationalism of your post.
1. A derailment on the Malahide Viaduct does not equate to the train ending up in the water - each track has 4 rails, so as to prevent a full derailment. 2. The deepest point of the Broadmeadow Estuary is about 2 metres. That isif the train ended up in the water, the water would come up to a bit above the table level. Sure, such a derailment would be a very serious indicident, but rail travel is fundamentally safer than road travel. http://www.garda.ie/Controller.aspx?Page=138
__________________
|
02-09-2009, 21:40 | #153 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Drogheda, Ireland
Posts: 1,275
|
I'm no expert, but I'm inclined to agree with victor. If a train derailed at that point, I think the most likely consequence is that the ends of two coaches would end up stuck in the water, but that most of the train would remain more or less on the tracks. Passengers would most likely be able to evacuate to adjacent carriages.
However, if it happened to a packed commuter train, I think some injury would be inevitable, and wouldn't rule out loss of life. |
02-09-2009, 23:01 | #154 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
There has been a lot of talk, there are 4 scenarios
1. Train passes without incident, unlikely 2. Train derails and is contained by the derailment prevention measures. Train stays upright due to the couplers and the anti override devices 3. Train derails and is not contained and falls onto the adjacent track. major damage and injuries but no water 4. Train derails and falls into estuary, aka the doomsday scenario Option 2 looks the most likely for a modern train
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
03-09-2009, 15:51 | #155 |
New to the board
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
|
Malahide viaduct
My point was not highlighting the potential dangers in travelling by rail.
I was more concerned about the preparedness of agencies which are tasked with implimenting the emergency plan.No one has commented about what could have happened and who would deal with the rescue of a large number of people from damaged rail carraiges. The point about carraiges falling or not into the water is surely a racing certainty if it was The Enterprise due to its speed at that point on the line doing exactly that. |
03-09-2009, 16:27 | #156 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Unless you want to actually try it out, no one will ever be able to show what might have happened, the Enterprise has all modern safety features and would have stayed upright and in line, the Enterprise travels no faster than any other train on the viaduct
There are regular safety drills with the emergency services. The last one took place within one of the tunnels near Greystones which is a very inaccessible location. The last passenger fatality was in 1983, 26 years ago. In the same period ballpark 9,000 died in road accidents
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
03-09-2009, 21:54 | #157 | |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
Quote:
One has to wonder how prepared all the emergency services (in terms of equipment / training etc) for all types of accidents that could have lots of casualties. I guess we should never hope to find out. Apologies for off topicness too. |
|
04-09-2009, 08:18 | #158 |
New to the board
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
|
Laytown
having read all the posts so far it is obvious that Irish rail haven't thought it through properly. For example, I work late in the city during the week, and finish at around 9.30. There are only two buses back to Drogheda, one at 9.00 and the last one at 11.20 p.m., therefore an almost two hour wait for the bus, which arrives in Drogheda train station after midnight. There are no buses, no links and no trains back to laytown station after 10.00, so making it impossible for me to get home using the arranged transport. I have contacted the customer service manager in Irish Rail, got a wonderful e-mail back about the wonderful arrangements they have in place, but didn't answer my question. "How to I get to Laytown late at night from Drogehda". To me it was obvious that the northern route is extensively used late into the night, with trains pretty well packed up to the 11.20 p.m. service to Drogheda, surely it didn't take a genius to see that people do go to Gormanston and laytown late at night, or are we not important enough to be concerned about.
|
04-09-2009, 10:07 | #159 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
After a good start IE have put up the usual wall of silence.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
04-09-2009, 23:03 | #160 |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|