|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
29-04-2010, 14:25 | #541 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
With the canvas scrolls, its the driver forgetting / not bothering change it.
With the electronic ones, it may be a database error, where the display is to display destination X (odd number) and destination X+1 How it should be programmed: 1 English name A 2 Irish name A 3 English name B 4 Irish name B 5 English name C 6 Irish name C 7 English name D 8 Irish name D How we suspect is it programmed 1 English name A 2 Irish name A 3 English name B 4 Irish name B 5 English name C 6 Alternative English name C or spurious entry 7 Irish name C 8 English name D 9 Irish name D Or 1 English name A 2 Irish name A 3 English name B 4 Irish name B 5 English name C 6 English name D 7 Irish name D 8 English name E Quote:
__________________
|
|
29-04-2010, 18:08 | #542 |
IT Officer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
|
I was on a train from Greystones to Howth earlier and it was saying next station Shankill as long as I was on it.
|
30-04-2010, 18:02 | #543 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
|
|
06-05-2010, 10:47 | #544 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Drumcondra, Dublin 9
Posts: 121
|
The 0805 ex Connolly commuter to Maynooth said Clonsilla on the front digital display. The driver announced at Broombridge that the train was bound for Maynooth. No other announcements - electronic or from the driver - made.
|
07-05-2010, 09:58 | #545 |
New to the board
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22
|
The 17.13 from Pearse to Dundalk yesterday and Wednesday displayed Drogheda on front of train and announcement on boarding thst the train was going to Drogheda. Lots of confused passengers, on both days, starting asking if it was going to Dundalk or not? Driver then announced that we were in fact Dundalk-bound.
On the 05.40 this morning from dundalk to Connolly - on board display continuously displaying that we were going to Castle Connell via Farranfore and NEWRY!!! The public announcement system was correct however for a tourist or any deaf passengers I'm sure this could cause major confusion!!! |
07-05-2010, 10:46 | #546 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cork City/Midleton/Mallow
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
|
|
10-05-2010, 10:59 | #547 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Drumcondra, Dublin 9
Posts: 121
|
|
30-05-2010, 17:37 | #548 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
[30-5-2010] 17:43 pearse maynooth
i boarded this train at clonsilla heading maynooth bound
The destination was showing as littleisland Stopping stations showing as kildare and knockroghery |
01-09-2010, 19:25 | #549 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
[1-9-2010] 19:20 docklands Clonsilla
Showing m3 parkway as the destination
|
01-12-2010, 19:55 | #550 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 242
|
The 13.30 Connolly to Rosslare arrived into tara st around 1415 but had Docklands on the front. I don't know if people didn't because of this
|
06-06-2011, 19:46 | #551 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
[6-6-2011] 17:40 rosslare connolly - a blast from the past!
The 17:40 rosslare connolly terminated in connolly a few minutes ago.
The front, sides and back panels were showing dundalk as the destination! |
06-06-2011, 20:31 | #552 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Train thought it was the Rosslare - Enniscorthy - Dundalk train (i.e. a normal Monday)
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
06-06-2011, 20:39 | #553 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
Is there stilla train from rosslare to connolly. I thought it was cancelled in the last timetable change?
|
05-01-2017, 18:34 | #554 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clonsilla
Posts: 2,812
|
I know this is a ghost thread at this stage but I had to post this https://mobile.twitter.com/Antonmcm/...70030324170752
|
05-01-2017, 20:37 | #555 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
Oh dear!, prehaps by accident driver hit 9 instead of 8 as part of ID or set change last minute.
|
09-01-2017, 16:14 | #556 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 180
|
I note IR have solved the problem of the DART in-carriage electronic maps being inaccurate.
By turning them off, and in some cases covering them over with a cardboard map. Success! I'm sure when IR buy their next set of trains, they'll make a big song and dance about the sophisticated PIS onboard, only to quietly turn them off a few years later because they can't be bothered maintaining them. |
09-01-2017, 21:06 | #557 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,146
|
I think they have been off with a long time. No easy or cheap fix possible. Its Clongriffin that caused them all the problems isn't it?
|
10-01-2017, 08:06 | #558 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sligo Line
Posts: 1,115
|
Whatever the reasons for it, that is a really nasty screw-up to have to face as a passenger. Irish Rail always seem to treat passenger information as an optional extra - sure everyone knows where they are going.
I first came across those electronic light-up maps in Tokyo over 20 years ago and they were fitted to pretty old trains. Needless to say they worked flawlessly. I found it far easier to get around Tokyo than I did to get around Dublin despite not having a shared common language with any railway staff and not even being able to read their native character set. But their electronic passenger information worked every time where fitted and every driver announced every stop every time on a PA that worked consistently, clearly and loudly and said nothing else. This is nothing to do with scale or investment - it's purely due to staff that give a damn. In Irish Rail, giving a damn is optional - most people do but enough don't to make for an inconsistent experience. |
16-01-2017, 23:05 | #559 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 130
|
Simple solution to all of the issues with the 29000 and 86xx class PIS is to fit the same system that was used in the 81xx class since that system is very reliable and a proven off the shelf system that was used by Siemens in many other different trains.
System in the other trains is cheaper and less reliable and built to a price rather than a specifications to win the tender for new stock. |
20-01-2017, 18:47 | #560 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
Much of the problem is poor data, e.g. new stations not added or drivers logging into the system with the wrong train ID.
__________________
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|