25-02-2009, 14:48 | #21 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
One word - Fastrack! |
|
25-02-2009, 15:06 | #22 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
For which the passenger is paying through the nose as it loses cash and requires every station to be staffed enroute
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
25-02-2009, 20:01 | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 45
|
Sligo trains
Folks if we keep the eight services we have on the Sligo line at the moment in the current environment I will be happy. I think the service has turned around this year will all trains fifty to sixty % full in either direction. I would suggest if you want to get a 21:00 train west of Maynooth is to get rid of the 17:15 or 18:18 trains and sent the 18:00 train to Longford with eight carriages and get rid of the 20:50 train from Longford to Dublin since there is a train at 20:20 ex Sligo. I think rosslare europort could do with another train at peak time since there is an expansion going on at the moment of the Carpark. I also suggest that Irish rail start making use of the tunnel from Hueston to Connolly and introduce a cork to Belfast service and Galway to Waterford service and Sligo to Gorey and Westport to Tralee service all via Connolly and Hueston to capitalize on the train investment. There is definitely use for that tunnel now instead of forking out borrowed money for more trains. I know that the sligo trains sit waiting until the next service is ready sometimes for an hour
|
25-02-2009, 21:59 | #24 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 176
|
The peak time trains can't be removed, but I would like to see later services than the last train out of Sligo and Longford.
Agree with use of the tunnel. It's a farce that it's not used.
__________________
"We'd like to apologise for..." |
25-02-2009, 22:40 | #25 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
I think your argument that Fastrack has meant that every station has to be manned is outrageous as there are numerous other reasons why stations have been manned - ticket sales, signal cabins, toilets and station upkeep. It also ignores the fact that vast majority of the travelling public prefer to have stations manned for security reasons. I really don't know where you are coming from - who do you (and R.U.I) represent - some far right wing organisation like IBEC? Your vision for Irish railways seems to be of a largely unmanned system running nothing but spartan passenger sevices on a very skeletal system concentrated on Dublin - a vision which is a recipe for the eventual closure of the entire railway outside the Greater Dublin Area. |
|
25-02-2009, 23:43 | #26 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Lets face some realities Irish Rail is in serious financial trouble, we are talking 30 odd million. The overtime paid to booking office staff last year is I'm told a 8 digit number. There is a serious need to review the staffing levels in order to meet the needs of the 21st century. There are heaps of stations which should be staffed, there are others which just don't have the numbers to justify it. Thats the European norm, having 4 staff on duty at a station with no more than 2 trains an hour doesn't add up
Curiously enough despite the majority of stations in Northern Ireland being unstaffed, they won a stack of customer service awards last week, why since they have focused on delivering the best service. We need to learn from them We need an effective efficient passenger service, effective and efficient are not two words known to Irish Rail. There is a case for a later service to either Longford or Sligo, there is a train lying idle and a railway line lying idle
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
26-02-2009, 21:48 | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 45
|
I agree with Mark. I know that the station i use on a regular basis has a least seven station masters and there is a service every two hours and offpeak and hourly peak I think Irish rail needs to do a voluntary severence package and more automated services to reduce headcount. I know in Belfast Central there are only four in the station at anytime.
|
26-02-2009, 23:38 | #28 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
In his reply to my post - if it was to my post - Mark showed all the hallmarks of his mortal enemies in IE. Just like Dick Fearn if he can't answer a specific point he ignores it. |
|
27-02-2009, 09:26 | #29 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
At the end of the day, the aim of RUI is to achieve a better passenger rail system. If Mark is right and FastTrack is losing money, then keeping it is contrary to the aims. If you think he's wrong, there's nothing stopping you setting up a FastTrack lobby group yourself. |
|
27-02-2009, 11:26 | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dublin
Posts: 707
|
+1. Though I do think restructuring FastTrack would have been better than axing it.
|
27-02-2009, 14:30 | #31 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 309
|
Agreed. Fastrack should not have been axed.
|
27-02-2009, 15:56 | #32 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
|
But being CIE/IE and the fact that things are done differently in Ireland I bring you this recent gem!
"Fearn Dick" <Dick.Fearn@irishrail.ie> Sent by: "Reardon Heidi" <Heidi.Reardon@irishrail.ie> 11/02/2009 14:27 To <thomas.broughan@oireachtas.ie> cc Subject RE: FasTrack Dear Deputy, I refer to your e-mail below regarding Iarnrod Eireann's decision to withdraw from the Fastrack service. The cessation of this element of Iarnrod Eireann?s business followed a management review undertaken in the second half of 2008. However special arrangements will be made to continue handling medical items due to the important nature of this particular service. Mr. Gerry Conlon, Manager Fastrack will be in contact with customers in due course to outline the details of the revised service. Many thanks Dick Fearn |
27-02-2009, 16:14 | #33 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 309
|
But the 22ks aren't able to accomodate fastrack packages.
Does this mean Mk3's will be retained to accomodate some fastrack 'medical' services? |
27-02-2009, 17:07 | #34 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
This is a passenger forum, if you want to bitch about Fastrack talk to IBEC or ISME. And yes there are facilities to carry parcels on a 22k and are being used right now
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
27-02-2009, 20:57 | #35 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 309
|
sorry, got a bit carried away with the fastrack issue. apologies
|
27-02-2009, 22:44 | #36 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 146
|
|
28-02-2009, 14:32 | #37 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
Thats enough
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|