15-01-2007, 21:37 | #21 |
Registered user
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kildare
Posts: 1,555
|
Thank god this is over.
|
15-01-2007, 23:37 | #22 |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
Jaysus im glad i got to read this whole thread in one go
|
16-01-2007, 12:56 | #23 |
New to the board
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
|
13.30 Cork / Heuston cancelled, set failed in tunnel and back to Cork, passengers per 14.30 Cork / Heuston, Stop Order issued for Limerick Jctn., 13.30 set followed 14.30, empty to Heuston. 13.55 Cork / Mallow and 14.35 Mallow / Cork cancelled as a result. District Manager Cork advised that set did not fail and problem was caused by lubricant applied to rail flange by P.W.D.
THE TRUTH SETS YOU FREE |
16-01-2007, 13:46 | #24 |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
Ohhhh............ more ****............
|
16-01-2007, 15:43 | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 216
|
|
16-01-2007, 17:40 | #26 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 585
|
I can't understand why kent can't have a new set of platforms that aren't on a curve. Surely there could be some kind of a simple junction setup to allow Cobh/Midleton-Mallow straight runs.
|
16-01-2007, 17:42 | #27 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
One of the proposals for the redevelopment of Kent involved moving the platforms eastwards and straightening them.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|