![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...232689921.html
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() We have had the expected dates in the members area since last Tuesday. As usual only a days public notice to the first event. RPA gave considerably more notice for Metro North
Just to note the Alexander Hotel is not on Merrion Square, its on Fenian Street. (Top of Westland Row, go left, pass Gingerman Pub on your left, Davenport Hotel on right, cross Cumberland Street, you have arrived at your destination)
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
![]() http://www.independent.ie/national-n...l-1452423.html
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
Should there be a "super stop" either on the Kildare and/or Northern lines to transfer from InterCity to local services? For Enterprise services, is the main objection to the Dogheda stop (a) the stop / time delay or (b) the potential overcrowding? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Donabate would be a good candidate for a superstop if Enterprise, DART and Metro North (extended beyond a Lissenhall field) all served it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
![]() http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...477454427.html
Did Frank not write an article a few weeks back opposing this because of the loss of some trees in Stephens Green during construction? Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
![]() http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...477454443.html
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() 6m internal diameter, that's 19'8 - how much clearance from rail to wire/tunnel is that likely to be? The Mount Royal tunnel in Montreal has a 14'6" height limit but AMT are ordering the same reduced height multilevel coaches as New Jersey Transit - although they are locohaul push/pull not EMUs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern line
Posts: 1,311
|
![]() Are they planned on removing the TBMs in St. Stephen's Green?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Thats really a matter for the contractor.
With Metro North the suggestion is that the TBM be parked in a stub tunnel and stripped, leaving the lining in place. Interconnector is a bit more up in the air. (Not! - pun!) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cathair Bhaile Átha Cliath
Posts: 199
|
![]()
__________________
R.I.P. T21 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Co. Wicklow
Posts: 124
|
![]() It think that's quite a good promotional piece and certainly sets in stone the importance of this piece of infrastructure. Very well establishes the idea of the expanded dart network. Well done IE. But follow through with those expansion figures!
Last edited by essoII : 15-06-2009 at 01:06. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
IT Officer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Greenwich, London
Posts: 1,860
|
![]() Sunday Times today has a suggestion about increasing use of the Phoenix Park tunnel. Can't find it online though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 395
|
![]() Here is the article
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6806595.ece Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Co. Wicklow
Posts: 124
|
![]() someone on archiseek.com already destroyed this loopy journalist:
"one problem is: why in the name of all that's bad and unholy would anybody coming from the Kildare direction go on a 25 min magical mystery tour to a docklands timbucktoo station when they can get the Luas from Heuston to OCS taking 10 mins. IE has surveyed this and 90% plus said they would get out at Heuston and get the Luas. In reality you could walk to OCS quicker from Heuston than going via the PP tunnell (speed redtricted lines) to Docklands and then finding your way back to the CC. IE has already scrapped the off peak Clonsilla trains to Docklands because the trains were arriving with no passengers. Nobody wants to go there. Neither does anybody other than the one passenger and his dog want to go to Phibsboro from Heuston. If you knew anything about this part of the city this would be clear to you. Nor can the PP trains get into Connolly which has no capacity for more services.. This author of this 'hold on I have the answer to everything' article could have saved making himself look like a fool if he'd made a phone call to IE for their take on it." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cathair Bhaile Átha Cliath
Posts: 199
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. T21 ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() This guy had spoken to us and we very clearly stated the Interconnector was the only show in town, Park Tunnel only really came into its own when the Interconnector was built
The numbers are interesting 2,000 per hour vs 30,000 per hour, its an easy choice
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
New to the board
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 3
|
![]() The lads on the www.archiseek.com forum were critical of Ruadhan Mac Eoin's article in the Sunday Times and he has (well it appears to be him) signed up and posted a reply:
http://archiseek.com/content/showthr...?t=6803&page=6 I'm just an average punter, but his plan seems hair-brained to me. I can't see how it would be much use. Would be very grateful if anyone here could shed more light on the subject... Last edited by Peter1966 : 25-08-2009 at 21:44. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Membership Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maynooth
Posts: 1,116
|
![]() Hey Peter,
This page has a lot of information on the project: http://www.railusers.ie/campaigns/extendthedart/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
New to the board
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 3
|
![]() I had read the info on http://www.railusers.ie/campaigns/extendthedart/
It's all good stuff and a compelling case is made for the underground interconnector - which I am strongly in favour of. I am worried about Ruadhan Mac Eoin's idea of using the Pheonix Park Tunnel instead of buliding the underground interconnector. It's strikes me that his scheme would be inadequate due to: 1. Lack of capacity 2. Slow train speeds 3. Lack of integration 4. No service to the Dublin 2 area. 5. Still a two track from Inchicore to Heuston Can anybody provide some facts and figures to flesh it out ? i.e. Under Mac Eoin's scheme: What would the additional journey time be to get from Parkwest to Spencer Dock ? How many less passengers and trains per hour could the line from Parkwest to Spencer Dock accomodate ? I noted that Mark says 2,000 vs. 30,000 - is that the PPT route (2,000) vs. the Underground Interconncetor (30,000) ? Last edited by Peter1966 : 26-08-2009 at 13:18. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|