![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
![]() Quote:
As for the level-crossings on the lower Glanmire Rd. I honestly think that having a bridge instead of the level crossings is preferable in terms of improved access. If Midleton and Cobh are operated at 2 tph during peak hours, that would mean 8 trains crossing the level crossings every hour. They would be blocked as often as they could get through. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Actually talking about 4 trains an hour from Midleton and 4 from Cobh, could be looking at up to 12 train movements per hour in the long term, the level crossings are dangerous enough just getting on/off the Glanmire Rd is serious fun
Nothing done now will proclude going to Youghal later |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() "Blandcrest and Gable Holdings, which have planning permission for 1,600 houses in Carrigtwohill, expressed concern that Iarnród Eireann was seeking to take away some of their land for an access road. Brian Archer who was representing the developers said this would mean they would be unable to build 34 houses."
So they gripe because the rail development which enabled them to get permission for such a huge number of houses in the first place might actually need some access route? Tells you a lot about the Brass Neck mentality of developers. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cork-Dublin, Cork Commuter and occasionally DART and Dublin-Wexford
Posts: 855
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Of course what this guy doesn't know is
1) If a bridge is possible safety people don't want level crossings 2) Automated CCTV 4 barrier crossings are €700,000 + and have a life of maybe 20 years and require constant attention 3) Standard bridge requires practically zero maintenance and will last 100+ years (first rail overbridge in Ireland is 172 years old and still in use) life cycle cost its a whole lot cheaper than a level crossing 4) If they had LC every time a train passed you would have to put up with the buzzer So the bridge is actually €200,000 cheaper Last edited by Mark Gleeson : 08-11-2006 at 16:21. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|