![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...292611384.html
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() P&R is all very well but slathering tarmac around only goes so far. Decent feeder service might help tip the balance for families considering going from 2 cars to 1 etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() http://dublinobserver.com/2011/03/lu...-consultation/
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Really Regular Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 767
|
![]() In a rational world, there would be levies on residential and office developments which create a demand for new infrastructure. Park and ride faclities, are part of the supply of transport infrasctucture so having levies on these is plain crazy: they should if anything be recipients of subsidies financed through development levies.
Yet another example of the extraordinary incompetence of public administration in Ireland. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Ehhhhhh, double edged sword. Ideally there would be dense development next to stops, served by feeder services. Ideally, in the absence of development along the southern half of the lines, its is the RPA that should have provided P&R - then it would capable of of being funded by the levies from eventual development.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|