![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Monasterevin
Posts: 34
|
![]() Hi,
Can anyone enlighten the panel as to the current status of KRP and when we might reap the benefits of its completion, specifically the oft hinted-at overhaul of the Kildare Route timetable ? Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() Its complete as of December last year, on time on budge etc.
The current slow outbound track is out of commission for relay and should be back for the 2011 timetable, again as per the plan. Until new trains arrive, Summer 2011 and the recession starts to lift no more trains, that said reductions in journey times should be coming along soon.
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() Will that mean all four tracks will be newlaid or is that only 3 of 4 done?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() All 4 will be by start 2011
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Monasterevin
Posts: 34
|
![]() Quote:
Just to clarify on your last para above, IE have new trains ordered specifically for the KRP but cant commission them due the recession or cant order new trains, or by "new" do you mean new services ? Ive said this before in some of my Monasterevan postings the recession is now being used as an excuse not to do the right thing by their customers. We felt this especially in Monasterevin when a small number of timetable changes promised end of 2009 were shelved due to "the recession" which started in 2008. Going by current forecasts, this recession we're in wont lift for 10 years so Id encourage other rail user groups and rail users _not_ to take the recession as an excuse for crap service. I'm sure Mark would back me up on that point ![]() Steve |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Local Liaison Officer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,442
|
![]() Quote:
Some of them will need to be commissioned even if no new services are provided as there is currently too few in reserve.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 395
|
![]() Quote:
Don't see why the extra 51 should be any different from the existing 3-car sets. Introducing a variant only complicates deployment. Anyway luggage racks are used on commuter service mostly for fold-up bikes. Removing them would a retrograde step. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() The 51 coaches on order are identical to the existing fleet in all aspects
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
![]() There are 57 coaches due next Summer, they should all be available for service by end 2011.
Obviously some of them will be simply filling the gaps at the moment as there is a shortage of trains some clearly will be deployed to provide more trains. Certainly be seeing faster services in the next year, but recession or no recession, if they ain't no trains you can't expand the service. The trains were specifically ordered for long distance commuter services
__________________
Unhappy with new timetable - let us know |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Really Really Regluar Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,371
|
![]() I'm just afraid that IE will find a way to "lose" the 2600s as the commuter 22s arrive.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 21
|
![]() Can you give an estimate of exactly what journey times we should expect?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|