MÃ*cheál Mac Gréil opinion piece

[Donal Quinn]

read this for waffle
[my comments in [] ]

Government thinking on railways now on right track

The reopening of the Western Rail Corridor from Limerick to Sligo would be a victory for common sense and democracy, writes MÃ*cheál Mac Gréil, SJ.

Recent indications point to Cabinet approval for the phased restoration of the Western Rail Corridor (WRC) from Limerick/Ennis to Collooney/Sligo. This is a major victory for common sense and democracy, which grants a modicum of fair play to the west of Ireland and is a concrete example of balanced regional development.

This rail corridor will link Sligo to the major towns and cities of the west, midwest, southwest and south of Ireland, as well as connecting all the radial mainline railways in and out of Dublin (apart from the Dublin-Belfast line).

From a social and economic perspective the reopening of the railway from Ennis to Collooney will involve the provision of a major piece of transport infrastructure. By generating development and facilitating commuters and regular travellers, it will be both "front-loading" infrastructure and responding to growing "critical mass". [what about providing infrastructure where the critical mass already exists]

The WRC has significant freight potential, particularly in relation to timber and export-import liner trains from the west and northwest to the major seaport of Waterford. The line also links the three international airports of Ireland-West Knock, Shannon and Cork. [linking airports - why?]

When the environmental benefits of the greater use of railways are added to the points already mentioned, the wisdom of the Government's decision (supported by the Opposition parties) becomes crystal clear to any objective observer.

The current developments have come about after a long and arduous campaign spearheaded by the Western Inter-County Railway Committee, which focused in the first instance on preventing the removal of the track and preserving the thoroughfare in public ownership.

The section from Claremorris to Collooney was not saved from abandonment until a decision in the early 1990s by the then Minister for Transport, Séamus Brennan. He gave an assurance that the line would be preserved until the Government reached a decision on its future, which it did in November 2005 with the announcement of Transport 21. By the late 1990s a new approach to railways was becoming apparent. The Government invested in track renewal, the upgrading of the main lines and the reintroduction of light-rail transport in Dublin city.

The folly and short-sightedness of the closures and abandonment of previous decades were now exposed. The decision-makers failed to take the longer view at the time. Two well-argued reports produced for our committee in 1981 and in 1992 were never taken seriously. In the context of Transport 21, they make interesting reading today.

The evolution of the WRC's case over the past four years was boosted by the establishment in 2003 of the West on Track community campaign, which came about as a direct result of the negative conclusions of the Strategic Rail Review in relation to the WRC, and the apparent lack of support for the WRC in CIÉ and Iarnród Éireann.

From the beginning the West on Track campaign was strongly supported by statutory bodies such as local and regional authorities, county development boards, the BMW Regional Assembly and the Western Development Commission.

West on Track and the Western Inter-County Railway Committee worked closely together and succeeded in bringing about the establishment by Mr Brennan of an expert working group under the chairmanship of Pat McCann. Both organisations were involved with the working group.

The McCann Report (2005) formed part of the basis on which the Government made its decision to reopen the WRC in two phases, ie Ennis to Claremorris and Claremorris to Collooney. [did it really?]

The report stated that the entire Ennis-Claremorris section could be reopened as a single viable project were the case in regard to the existence of rail freight traffic to be established.

However, since the report was published a new freight service has been introduced between Ballina and Waterford, carrying high-value freight cargoes for export. Every week these four trains, together with eight Coillte pulpwood trains, are required to travel through the greater Dublin area. Opening the WRC will allow these freight services to grow by taking a more direct and less congested route. [and that's worth 400m?]

In conjunction with the first phase of the reopening of the railway from Ennis to Claremorris, the Government has decided to clean, drain and fence the track bed from Claremorris to Collooney. This work is due to begin this autumn, in preparation for an expected decision in 2008 to reopen this section.

I believe that the reopening of the railway at Charlestown should be prioritised in view of the rapid growth and development in the adjacent Knock airport.

It is important to view the coming development of the WRC in the context of the ambitious national plan to develop railways throughout the country. All parts have urgent transport needs, but they must never be seen to be competing against one another. [except for funding????]

Indeed, the development of overland transport infrastructure should be bimodal, ie rail and road. By developing the WRC, we are putting in place another important piece of infrastructure, one which will ultimately prove to be of enormous benefit to all our citizens.

Dr Mac Gréil is a former senior lecturer in Sociology (NUI Maynooth) and author of the 1981 report on the restoration of the Sligo-Limerick rail service. He is joint-secretary of the Western Inter-County Railway Committee and patron of West on Track

(c) The Irish Times 18 September 2006
-------------
on your marks.....!!

[Mark Gleeson]

Problem in this country is no one bothers to double check the facts people quote.

Strange that the little freight that already operates without the WRC is profitable, and none of the freight that goes via Westport or Ballina comes within 30 miles of Dublin. I've done some math on track capacity and there is plently of it on the Kildare Waterford section and outside peak hours no shortage on the Westport Portarlington section

There are 2 trains to Ballina and 2 from Ballina for Norfolkline the article implies 4 in each direction

The distance advantage by WRC is about 15 miles that said it would still be faster via the existing route since its a mainline. Going via the WRC would mean using the Limerick Waterford line which is in poor shape and not electronically signalled and has 17ton axle limit where as the existing route has a 20ton limit that means you can't use the 201 class locomotives, noting that IE have recently increased the permissible weight of the Norfolk line trains only a 201 or 071 is allowed haul, I'd love to see how a 900 ton train will make it up and down the hills of the WRC. Problem is even a 071 is too heavy for the WRC. 201 will drag 1200 tons up a 1 in 60 and given the freight situation the trains will be fewer in number but those that run will getting longer to minimise costs.

Since we know a thing or two the section north of Tuam is dead, north of Claremorris is so far off the agenda that it has no chance at all. Having looked at the Middleton situation which is broadly similar in terms of condition a huge amount of civil works are required. In light of this we expect that for the section north of Tuam a works order would be required thus requiring a public inquiry, EIS and so forth, it will take at least 2 years to produce that a further year to get through the red tape

We have done our math and one simple fact means the WRC won't be opening anytime soon, IE have no rolling stock to operate the line and if anything more is taken from Dublin war will break out

As always WoT never promote or support a real service, Galway commuter is a real goer

[Mark]

However, since the report was published a new freight service has been introduced between Ballina and Waterford, carrying high-value freight cargoes for export. Every week these four trains, together with eight Coillte pulpwood trains, are required to travel through the greater Dublin area. Opening the WRC will allow these freight services to grow by taking a more direct and less congested route. [and that's worth 400m?]there isn't much of the latter in the freight business at the moment.

And another point, isn't Ballina to Waterford via Dublin rather than via Galway and Limerick more direct and faster? Time is money fellas and we all know there isn't much of the latter in the freight business at the moment.

[Donal Quinn]

so is P11 going to put this in to irish times?

[Mark Gleeson]

There is no point arguing with WoT, in reality they just killed themselves by pointing out that the freight is already running, and its going by the cheapest route possible and requires no extra signalling staff etc just marginal costs on track wear, Tuam Claremorris would be at full cost

The arguement is purely freight thus we are keeping well clear

Don't worry despite the party piece the outcome for the WRC is poor, it won't happen what will happen is a commuter service for Galway

[Thomas J Stamp]

so is P11 going to put this in to irish times?

No. It is their campaign and their right to lobby for it. Our official position is as stated on the main website:

http://platform11.org/campaigns/wrc/

All posts on the message boards in connection with the WRC are the personal opinions of the posters, even committee members, and not the offical line of P11.

One thing must be added though. If and when any section of the WRC is built we will campaign for the passengers on it when they are stuck with a lousey service on clapped out trains that run late or never turn up.

[Jister]

Originally Posted by Mark Gleeson

Since we know a thing or two the section north of Tuam is dead, north of Claremorris is so far off the agenda that it has no chance at all. Having looked at the Middleton situation which is broadly similar in terms of condition a huge amount of civil works are required. In light of this we expect that for the section north of Tuam a works order would be required thus requiring a public inquiry, EIS and so forth, it will take at least 2 years to produce that a further year to get through the red tape

Why would a railway order be required Tuam-Claremorris and not Tuam-Athenry?

[Mark Gleeson]

Originally Posted by Jister

Why would a railway order be required Tuam-Claremorris and not Tuam-Athenry?

The line north of Tuam is a much lower quailty and has level crossings everywhere, under the current safety regime every single one must be studied and where reasonably practical elinimated, normally by bridge. That requires CPO etc and a railway order is the best way of getting that when a very large number of crossings are involved

[CSL]

The gentleman in the picture was just released from prison in Germany last week, name Fr. Horan.

[ACustomer]

Any relation to Mgr Horan of Knock Airport fame? Just a coincidence that when he gets out, we have a WRC piece in the IT within a few days? Next think they will be arguing that they deserve the WRC as compensation for losing the All-Ireland.

[Thomas J Stamp]

.