|
02-10-2006, 22:40 | #1 |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
Press Release 2nd October 2006
We have released the following which speaks for itself.
"TEMPLEMORE TRAIN USERS express disappointment with Irish Rail attitude The committee of the Templemore Train Users Group wishes to put on record its dissapointment with the attitude of Irish Rail regarding the downgrading of rail services to Templemore. On the 13th September, an attendance in excess of 130 people in the Templemore Arms Hotel heard Myles McHugh of Irish Rail state that he would engauge in consultation with TTUG regarding the new timetable, which he stated would be finalised within three weeks. However since then, despite categorical assurance to revert to us within seven to ten days, he has failed to do so. Mr McHugh, on behalf of Irish Rail, has told members of the Templemore Train Users Committee, they will not, in fact "negotiate" with its members, or passengers, in relation to the timetable, but that "he had heard enough" at the meeting and that Irish Rail proposed to meet with the committee and presenting the timetable that Irish Rail already decided upon. At the meeting of the 13th September former Mayor of Templemore Michael Connell stated that he had twice telephoned Mr McHugh to discuss the situation with him, but he had never recieved a response. It appears that this strategy of Irish Rail of paying lip service to consulting with its passengers is, sadly, continuing. TTUG will not stand idly by and we call upon Irish Rail to have the courtesy of meeting with TTUG, a body it claims to have set up, and confiming that there will be no downgrading of services for Templemore and that all services will be preserved in their current state. ENDS." |
13-12-2006, 14:10 | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kazbegi
Posts: 281
|
Found this on the IRN website
Quote:
|
|
13-12-2006, 14:32 | #3 |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
That poor man! Isnt his life awfull enough without having to stop at Templemore????
|
13-12-2006, 15:30 | #4 |
Regular Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 141
|
I may be mixing things up here but I seem to remember Mark G, saying a while back that the Templemore stop would be removed from Dublin-Cork trains because the platforms are too short, the RSC won't permit the new Mk4s to stop there and any attempt from IE to stop MK4's in Templemore will lead to Mark making a complaint to the RSC. Now we have a P11 commitee member lobbying IE to stop trains in Templemore. I'm not getting at you Thomas just wondering what P11 policy is in relation to Templemore?
|
13-12-2006, 15:40 | #5 |
Technical Officer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coach C, Seat 33
Posts: 12,669
|
The problem in Templemore is that the commuter trains where pulled by IE in the draft 2007 timetable
The off peak service was Ok The Dublin bound platform in Templemore is actually longer than Portarlington, I haven't measured up a Mk4 there but its only the last coach, coming from Dublin its more like coaches A, B, C & D. Commitment on platform extension has been given If IE play hard ball the RSC get dragged in, the legal status of a over length train is confused but the intercity railcars is different since if you are in the rear 3 coaches of a 9 car or a pair of 3 cars you can't get out on a Mk4 you can walk through I will admit I've never used Templemore station despite it being 2 miles closer to where I'm going, I go through Thurles though I have been in the station once or twice |
13-12-2006, 17:08 | #6 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kazbegi
Posts: 281
|
You still have a pump in Templemore??????
|
13-12-2006, 17:47 | #7 | |
Chairman/Publicity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Home of Hurling
Posts: 2,708
|
Quote:
P11 policy towards Templemore would be a simple non-downgrading of services in accordance with whatever the local action group (TTUG) wants; same applies to KRUG and Newbridge rail users group. Platforms: TTUG has a committment from IE regarding the short platform (Cork side) to be lenghtend and a timescale for that. At the moment, the Mk4's stop at Templemore going to Dublin (long platform) but dont going to Cork (because of the short Platform). The priority is to ensure that passengers can get into and out of Dublin at times to allow them to work in Dublin. When we started talking we IE we were on the verge of losing that, now we have definite commitments that guarantee it, although we're not 100% happy with the proposals regarding evening services but we understand that it'll sorted out in Dec 07 Timetable and we have been given a departure time from Dublin in that timetable that is acceptable. Our next goal is mid-morning services and we're getting somewhere there as well. I'm relucutant to go into it any further. I dont care if its Cork, Limerick or The Moon where these trains originate or go to as long as it works. At the moment we dont have much of a Cork service (stopping in Templemore down bound) excpet I think the first one of the day, all other times you change at Thurles, a system that is to be regularised in the new timetable, all the triains eventually in Templemore will be Limerick ones, and you change at Thurles in a hub and spoke arraingement, the new timetable will be in effect a hybrid, Dec 07 will see the changeover to Hub and Spoke in full. As for what Mr Mallow says, this article about 200kph running is nothing new it was debated here ages ago and has been going for months, only now he pops up with his Templemore comments, which have nothing to do with Templemore itself, but his hatred of the fact that the passangers are having a say in how his train set works. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|