All I know is that it is against the interest of the passenger, who we are working for, to get bogged down with this carry on.
Given that it risks scotching the project because it's 'gold-plated,' might be less reliable than conventional light-rail catenary, and would probably have passengers making unnecessary mode changes, it just strikes me as a dreadful idea - particularly from a passenger perspective, but also from a cost and engineering perspective - and not something a passenger representative body should support.
You criticise me for "preferring wikipedia" but I'll take something that just works, efficiently, over something that might work, inefficiently, each and any time the choice arises.
|