![]() |
[article] Land row puts key rail station in jeopardy
Quote:
|
:rolleyes:
Nothing, absolutely nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to transport "planning" in this country. The Dunkettle train station has been part of the CASP to my knowledge. The Midleton line has been "in delivery" since 2003. So why couldn't the NRA have paid attention? |
I think the old Dunkettle station was at the 'old' roundabout (which is still there). There isn't enough space there for a park and ride, there might be space on the far side of the railway, but the roads required just add to the complication of the Dunkettle Interchange.
The might be space to the east of the interchange near the freight yard (is that closed?). |
Quote:
Quote:
|
NRA = State agency paid for by us.
IE = Semi State company essentially owned by us. Cork County Council = State agency paid for by us. Work together God Dam it. Come up with a solution that will make Dunkettle partially free flow with easy access to a station car park for people coming from the East and North. And how to go about this - hire one Architect, one tender process, one contruction company. |
This is really intriguing. The County Development Plan was revised just over a year ago to accommodate the Park and Ride, this was a very public process. The map shows the new Park and Ride facility wedged up against the North East of the Dunkettle Interchange, but amazingly this sailed through at the time.
I was at an exhibition of RPA / Cork Co Co's plans for an upgrade to Dunkettle Road last week, and when I queried the fact that footpaths did not continue all the way to the railway site I was told that O'Flynn's would be providing these as part of their massive development (which does not have planning permission). It seems also that a slip road will be built coming from Cork, underneath the N8 North of the Dunkettle Interchange, to allow fast access FROM THE CITY to the Park and Ride, logical or what? Again provided by O'Flynn's! The North Esk freight yard has plenty of space for a Park and Ride, and would not impinge on any junction upgrade. It would however make O'Flynn's proposal (1200 "units") seem less sustainable as it would massively reduce the amount of it within 20 minutes walk of the station, the guideline that they themselves are touting as ideal. There is more than just a lack of joined up thinking going on here. |
Quote:
|
Can we have the banging head against wall emoticon imported please? (see below)
![]() Really needed... |
Quote:
/wanders off to CCC website. EDIT: Dunkettle information is listed, but not online. http://www.corkcoco.ie/co/web/Cork%2...opment%20Plans http://www.corkcoco.ie/co/web/Cork%2...0Plan%20Review Is the Faber Maunsell study available online? |
Would North Esk not be too close to Little Island station for it to be practical as a station location in its own right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The ARUP study is online though
http://www.transport.ie/upload/general/2558.pdf Various other reports http://www.railusers.ie/resources/rail_projects.php A copy of the Faber Maunsell study would be nice :) |
So this is a copy of the variation that included the park and ride in the development plan. Its not online on the Cork County Council website for some reason - maybe this is why the NRA missed it. :) The variation modifies both the overall county development plan and the local development plan, hence it is in two parts.
There are two issues: 1. It is really difficult to make the interchange freeflow without the site suggested for the park and ride. 2. The access to the site suggested for the park and ride is problematic: a. It can't come off the existing roundabout as it is already overly busy. b. If the interchange is upgraded the park and ride still won't have access as any potential access will be designed out to make the interchange freeflow. Neither of these is fatal, as you could access the park and ride from the local roads, but it does make the P&R car park rather complicated with two slip roads running through it and another two elevated slip roads over it. I also attach a drawing with a suggested layout for the interchange upgrade. The design would probably need to be quite close to this if it is to be fully free-flowing. The main problem arises with the slope down to the tunnel, which prevents the layoutt from being mirrored. The P&R site is outlined in white. http://localhostr.com/files/ce21aa/D...ndment%201.pdf http://localhostr.com/files/8f97e6/D...ment%201. pdf http://localhostr.com/files/a1eb76/D...iation%205.pdf http://localhostr.com/files/dbab25/dunkettle4a.jpg |
€400m housing development in Cork gets the green light
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/...241835024.html
Quote:
|
So the trick is wait for the station to be built and then you don't have to pay for its provision, just the roads? Or has the IT missed a contribution OFC are making to the project?
|
They are required to pay 6m euro towards the upgrade of Dunkettle Road, just under 1m euro towards the railway station, and intriguingly, operate a shuttle bus from Glanmire to the Dunkettle station for a period of 3 years after it opens. But let's wait and see...
|
Those upgrades would both be badly needed in Cork.
|
Bord Pleanála has refused permission for the station as "premature pending the determination by the Planning Authority and the NRA of a road layout for the Dunkettle Interchange" - http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/229796.htm
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.