New EU Rail Passenger Rights
 

Did anyone hear B Kenny tonight? The much vaunted EU guidelines for rail customer rights was put before the European Parliament yesterday. Obviously one of the rights refers to refunds for late running trains. Kenny promoted the fact that IE have been doing this already under their secret...oopps... sorry...I mean well known (apparently) customer charter. The FineGael MEP had never heard of it. Matt Cooper had never heard of it and none of the listeners texting in had heard of it. Cooper suggested that IE call the advertising section of TodayFM.:D

Most regulars around here will know that IE do not promote and in the majority of cases reported to us, don't even inform passengers of the right to a refund. Furthermore the refund is irrelevent to weekly/monthly/annual ticket holders. Kenny cited one incident where IE managers stood on platforms handing out the refund form. We remember that don't we? It was after a raft of complaints from P11 members. Sadly the particular manager that reacted to that has left the company, so the status quo returns.

Needless to say we have known about these magic EU regulations for some time and IE are in for one hell of a shock

[article] MEPs agree rules to compensate rail users facing long delays
 

If I was senior IE management I'd be getting very concerned about this

Remember the customer charter is an admission of failure, if a decent service was provided few if any of the scenarios in the charter would come into play, and of course its not legally enforceable.

Only 18 months to go before it becomes legally enforceable, if IE continue with there current two fingers to the passenger approach they are going to be very badly hurt by legal proceedings and fines

Will they sort themselves out in time, doubtful

http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ire...324763780.html
© 2007 The Irish Times

I thought Barry Kenny kinda blew Matt and the MEP out of the water totally. He said the customer charter has been in place for 9 years - is that correct? The MEP (can't remember his name now) came on as if he was all knowledgeable and that this would make a big difference yet he had no idea about this charter!
Can you explain to me how they are in for a hell of a shock?
So what if they don't advertise this, why would they? Airlines don't advertise what your rights are with them

Legal enforcement of refunds for service delays
Right to a refund in cash
Season ticket holders entitled to refunds/discounts
Sets down basic information requirements
Legal deadlines on complaints
A legal definition that the liability is with the operator
Legal requirement to public info on complaints and performance

Requires every member state to form a independent body to oversee that the rules are followed.

The current IE customer charter is worth nothing, its not legal document, if IE break the charter as they do virtually every minute of every day there is no recourse to stop IE. New rules IE screw up they get fined

The IT reports that it is for cross-border trains, does this mean it will only apply to Enterprise trains?

It applies to all rail services operated under the usual EU rail service licence 95/18/EC anywhere in the EU block. Note the RPSI don't fall under this

The first draft was for international travel only, that was quickly revised to all rail travel

Note international travel is covered by the CIV rules already

The IE/DoT deal does not specify compensation and is not enforceable, we know since we got the document after much hassle

Wouldn't a % of total journey time be more appropriate? A half-hour delay on a trip from Kildare is pretty awful, but not really as bad if it's a longer journey like Galway - Dublin.

Was reading about in the Indo also.

Having a look at the rail charter now and noticing this

"Users' rights for rail services include the receipt of information regarding the service both
before and during the journey.."

I would assume this includes information on the train destination and intermediate stops while on the train. The 07:18 train from Drogheda - Bray is ridiculous. 3 mins or so before each stop the driver announces the next stop. The volume is so low that if you're sleeping you miss your stop plus you've no idea of how many stops there is til pearse etc. Or how there is no electronic display in Drogheda, so if there's no one in the booth, you've no chance of knowing of any train delays.

Seems to be no provision that customers must be guaranteed a seat though :(

That is because commuters shouldn't expect one. Seats are nice but I do not expect one everyday, rather I am happy if I do get one. :)

I concur on that point, but what about in cases where passengers have pre reserved seating ?

I myself am happy to get one and don't expect to get a seat most of the time, I don't mind having to stand, as long as I have enough room to lift my water bottle up to drink :p

You get a full refund if you are left standing with a reserved seat or get stuck in standard despite having a first class ticket

We are more than happy to do a trial run on this, its fairly trivial to select a train which claims to have first but doesn't and effectively travel for free once the refund arrives

Note the EU will mandate the refund be provided in money upon request of the passenger

That is comforting to know that prebooked passengers will get compensated.

I hope that Article 28; Complaints, will help to improve the rail system and customer satisfaction with

"..Within one month, the addressee of the complaint shall either give a reasoned
reply or, in justified cases, inform the passenger by what date within a period of less than three
months from the date of the complaint a reply can be expected."

and
"..The railway undertaking shall publish in the annual report referred to in Article 29(3) the
number and categories of received complaints, processed complaints, response time and possible
improvement actions undertaken..."

It seems quite promising.

IE claim to do the within a month thing already, but its rare that they make the deadline

There is a secret report sent quartely from IE to the DoT with the performance results, problem is its contents vary widely, the first one was very good on detail the more recent ones are just passenger numbers and punctuality

Of course getting your hands on it requires some serious thought

That's a pity that the reports contents are allowed to vary - surely there must be some standards existing on what the report should contain, one might be inclined to have a negative view on this and wonder what details they are glossing over and not adding in?

Here's the link to Today FM:
http://audio.todayfm.com/lwpodcasting.xml
Go to 25/09/07, first hour (i.e.5-6pm) @ 18 mins...
Weak interviewing by Matt, yet again......

No Barry its about attitude and lazy staff who don't bother to tell us

Once the DOT get it can't it be FOI'd ? it's not commercially sensitive since they have no competition.

How did you think we got it, I didn't do a mission impossible style absail, though as some members will know that is a very practical option for me at the moment :D

IE still retain the right to object to the application and that adds 3 weeks to the request

There is an awful lot of paper involved and its expensive very expensive and you need to know the exact name of the file to get the results. And I'm fairly sure I didn't get every document available

Members area has a selection of the documents

The only thing kenny blew was his....I mean hot air.

Our experience based on customer feedback suggests people don't know about it. Texts in the radio show suggest the same. There is very very little advertising to promote it since its inception.

The shock they are in for has already been explained.

They should advertise and promote it.

We don't do airlines here, we do railways.

Any more questions or rediculous ill informed opinions that serve to undermine the integrity of basic customer service?