![]() |
M50 is still cack in the eveings anyway. I go Newcastle (Co. Dublin) -> Greenhills for work each day. I just miss the morning rush but I hit the 5pm traffic square on. I go Ballymount->M50(N)->N7(W)->Newlands Cross->R136->home. The M50 northbound to the Red Cow is usually a long queue to get off there and idiots cutting in holding up lane 2 make it worse. Can't wait for them to open the M50(N)->N7(W) freeflow slip but it's months off yet.
|
Quote:
When you think about it, the parking charges would add 33% onto my fare if I used it (I walk ~20 minutes most days), but I don't. It's still cheaper and quicker than the car. |
Thats assuming the train is there when you need it, after all the service is at best hourly for most of the day
Most people don't think in such logical terms, they see price go up, service is crap |
Quote:
It would be more interesting if the drop off in demand at the stations was offset by an increase in road use. There isn't any hard facts to support this though and any evidence is anecdotal at best. No wonder you only ended up in the Daily Star. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What is official data in the context of this argument? If we could only speculate as to why the trains were packed over the boom years, why can't the same apply as numbers thin out? For the record, I don't think Car parking alone is the reason though from talking to other Commuters about this it is a combinatorial reason for moving away from IE. All of the factors mentioned in this thread, the recession, the absence of foreign workers, road improvements and the general Irish Rail incompetence are all causes though I doubt the official figures will cite the last factor :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Perhaps get in touch with the respective journos? |
Quote:
Not wild assumptions like the following. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Personally, getting into the tabloids is good. Its important to get the RUI name out to all kinds of reader, but not when you have to resort to assumptions and speculation parading as fact. |
Well is there any facts to prove Mark wrong?
Someone who says someones facts don't add up should at least have some facts to counter the argument, some data perhaps, maybe somebodys got some numbers to prove Mark wrong but until they appear well pots and kettles spring to mind. Quote:
remember all theorys are equally valid until they are disproven and anything we accept as a fact now is capable of been overturned with fresh evidence. Now wheres me daily star thats got numbers in it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I suppose you're gonna lock the thread now.:D |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.